Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumWhy hasn’t Bernie Sanders fired the top advisors who trashed him to the New York Times?
http://www.dailynewsbin.com/opinion/why-hasnt-bernie-sanders-fired-the-top-advisors-who-trashed-him-to-the-new-york-times/24382/Earlier this week something stunning happened on the national political scene. No, not the front page New York Times story in which the top advisors for the Bernie Sanders campaign all blamed its demise on his unwillingness to listen to their advice. Thats par for the course when a losing campaign is nearly over, and the people who ran it want to make clear to any future employers that the loss wasnt their fault. Whats remarkable is that, days later, these same people are still somehow in charge of Bernies campaign. Why the hell hasnt he fired them yet?
The inaction of Bernie Sanders on this matter raises a number of questions. Candidates on the campaign trail have wall to wall schedules and every minute is taken up, so they often rely on their advisors to put things in front of them. Is it possible his advisors have kept him so isolated from the outside world that theyve managed to make sure he hasnt seen the New York Times article in question? Is it possible they have shown it to him, but his trademark political obliviousness has kept him from understanding why his own people were throwing him under the bus? Or perhaps Bernie knows full well that hes been sold out by advisors who are now trying to cover their own backsides, but he figures hes so near the end of his sinking campaign that there would be no point in bringing in new handlers at this late date.
In any case its difficult to imagine the tenor inside the upper echelon of the Sanders campaign at this point. Every top advisor with even a basic understanding of election math knows that he was realistically eliminated on March 15th but does Bernie know it? Are his advisors overspending to win mathematically meaningless small states and floating absurd superdelegate-flipping fantasies as a way of convincing Bernie he still has a chance, so hell keep the campaign going longer and theyll keep getting paid? Or have they done their jobs in good faith and told him its over, but he wants to keep it going because he doesnt understand electoral math?
If the televison news networks would do their jobs and have their embedded reporters in the Sanders campaign tell us whats actually going on, we wouldnt be forced to speculate. But because the good guy underdog Bernie still has a chance narrative has been too good for television ratings for any network to want to give up on it, no matter how painfully fictional of a storyline it is at this point, we get no straight answers from those journalists who are in a position to know.
The inaction of Bernie Sanders on this matter raises a number of questions. Candidates on the campaign trail have wall to wall schedules and every minute is taken up, so they often rely on their advisors to put things in front of them. Is it possible his advisors have kept him so isolated from the outside world that theyve managed to make sure he hasnt seen the New York Times article in question? Is it possible they have shown it to him, but his trademark political obliviousness has kept him from understanding why his own people were throwing him under the bus? Or perhaps Bernie knows full well that hes been sold out by advisors who are now trying to cover their own backsides, but he figures hes so near the end of his sinking campaign that there would be no point in bringing in new handlers at this late date.
In any case its difficult to imagine the tenor inside the upper echelon of the Sanders campaign at this point. Every top advisor with even a basic understanding of election math knows that he was realistically eliminated on March 15th but does Bernie know it? Are his advisors overspending to win mathematically meaningless small states and floating absurd superdelegate-flipping fantasies as a way of convincing Bernie he still has a chance, so hell keep the campaign going longer and theyll keep getting paid? Or have they done their jobs in good faith and told him its over, but he wants to keep it going because he doesnt understand electoral math?
If the televison news networks would do their jobs and have their embedded reporters in the Sanders campaign tell us whats actually going on, we wouldnt be forced to speculate. But because the good guy underdog Bernie still has a chance narrative has been too good for television ratings for any network to want to give up on it, no matter how painfully fictional of a storyline it is at this point, we get no straight answers from those journalists who are in a position to know.
more...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 874 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why hasn’t Bernie Sanders fired the top advisors who trashed him to the New York Times? (Original Post)
Her Sister
Apr 2016
OP
Stand and Fight
(7,480 posts)1. 4 paragraphs please. Thanks. n/t
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)2. Is BS insulated?
or just is it OK with him the NYT interview where his inner circle put the blame on him on not doing better?
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)3. Nada de los cojones n/t