I've been strongly advised that it's The Man keepin' Bernie down, and that there were widespread electoral shennanigans when you look at the exit polls*.

* I'm sure reminders that exit polls suck even worse than primary polling would fall on deaf ears. The MoE of those polls is unbelievably high.

A candidate wins by 10% he/she should win a majority of delegates. Can we also agree that the system is seriously flawed and needs major reforms.

rules...which have been available for ages. I guess he should've tried a little harder to earn that extra delegate.

1. not having all primaries be closed, and

2. allowing DINOSs like Bernie Sanders to run as a Dem. There should be a rule that you must have a minimum of 5 consecutive years leading up to the election announcement year as a member of the Democratic Party to be allowed to run as a D in a D presidential primary. That would mean that you would have needed to be a D from at least 2010-2015 to announce in 2015.

When it let's a fucking Independent run in the Democratic primary.

Yes we need a major reform!

....in DEMOCRATIC primaries and caucuses. That would be a huge improvement.

Look for that to be discussed in future years.

The scenario that occurred with Wyoming could only happen with Wyoming because of the delegates allocated for them based on their general election votes. Every state with one congressional district except for Wyoming has more than 8 delegates. There are 7 states and DC that have only one congressional district. The election result that occurred in Wyoming would not had resulted in a tie in the other states with just one congressional district. Keep in mind that the rules are the same in each state when doing the calculation.

Because Wyoming is a red state meaning that the average votes for Kerry in 2004, Obama in 2008 and 2012 were the lowest of all states and resulted in them receiving only 14 total delegates.
Wyoming had a combined total of 222,930 votes compared to Alaska with 357,259 for the 3 elections.