Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 01:06 PM Oct 2014

Hillary is right. Businesses don't create jobs.

Jobs are created by
1) Human wants or needs. No customers, no jobs.
2) Technology and resources. No production possibility, no jobs.

Businesses are ONE way to organize resources (including labor) and technology to meet wants and needs. Other ways are: government, nonprofits, cooperatives, communes, DIY. Different methods fit different kinds of wants and needs.

The real story is that Hillary's commonsense and correct observations are being treated as some sort of scandal -- heresy -- blunder. This is a measure of how totally the interest of the billionaire class control the media.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2808780/Hillary-Clinton-attempts-attack-trickle-economics-ends-saying-corporations-businesses-don-t-create-jobs-major-campaign-fumble.html

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary is right. Businesses don't create jobs. (Original Post) rogerashton Oct 2014 OP
Yes, she certainly is right. Little Star Oct 2014 #1
not entirely true in our lovely system that we (probably wrongly) call capitalism unblock Oct 2014 #2
None of that matters. Phlem Oct 2014 #5
we clued into this a while ago Phlem Oct 2014 #3
Oh, agreed. rogerashton Oct 2014 #8
she's right demigoddess Oct 2014 #4
ah but you're missing the shifting economic landscape -- unblock Oct 2014 #6
well, then they will be living in the middle of demigoddess Oct 2014 #10
The sad fact is DonCoquixote Oct 2014 #13
yep demigoddess Oct 2014 #15
right up there with DonCoquixote Oct 2014 #7
yep a have a few friends on FB that come from small towns, Phlem Oct 2014 #9
Hillary and the truth. gunboatguy Oct 2014 #11
as someone from a family of shopkeeps DonCoquixote Oct 2014 #12
I don't deny rogerashton Oct 2014 #14
And where is Hillary rubbing elbows gunboatguy Oct 2014 #16
Criticism of Hillary Clinton is not appropriate in this room. hrmjustin Oct 2014 #17
Hillary is explaining the simple economics of demand. Any company who does not Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #18
Well yes, but rogerashton Nov 2014 #19
Do you believe in the demand process? Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #21

unblock

(52,243 posts)
2. not entirely true in our lovely system that we (probably wrongly) call capitalism
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 01:18 PM
Oct 2014

certainly, the *legitimate* economic allocation of resources is demand-driven, and businesses simply recognize those demands and satisfy them, hiring people as needed to do so.

however, there's plenty of evidence that advertising, concealing/shading of facts, outright lies, gotcha games, etc., all are supply-driven parts of the economy that involve hiring people to essentially extract wealth from innocents without meaningfully adding to their overall happiness or satisfying any particular demand.

fly-by-night businesses, fear-based products and services, bank fees, insurance claim denial/delay, and others could be seen as falling into this category.


the reason the business-oriented meme sticks is because business-types think like business-types, not as economists. in their view, they're sitting in a room deciding to expand and to hire and to pay for new people to work, then they're the ones creating the jobs, not thinking that they're simply responding to a demand that already exists out there, *because often that demand doesn't exist without their advertising*.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
3. we clued into this a while ago
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 01:36 PM
Oct 2014

With the "rich" don't make jobs.

The co-author of the TTP also knows that it will kill jobs undermine pay for the worst.

Just because she says it doesn't mean it's an original idea. m kay?

unblock

(52,243 posts)
6. ah but you're missing the shifting economic landscape --
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 02:25 PM
Oct 2014

business thrive on a healthy middle class, and there *is* an emerging middle class -- in china and india!

thanks to the wonders of globalization, big american megacorps no longer need a thriving middle class *here*.

they can to quite well selling to customers abroad while the rest of us here are left to cut their hair and mow their lawns and deliver their packages.

demigoddess

(6,641 posts)
10. well, then they will be living in the middle of
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 06:36 PM
Oct 2014

a violent cesspool or they will have to move to China or some other socialist country.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
13. The sad fact is
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 01:03 PM
Oct 2014

They will be quite welcome, and quite free to live the hyper decadent lifestyle there they did here. Miss Las vegas? try Macau. Take a jet over to Dubai, where the natives make a smallminority of the population anyway.

The rpoblem is, the rich today are Pirates, people for whom one port of call is just another another place to plunder and captuire slaves. What is worse is that they have the morals or pirates, but all the poltical connections and false venerations of Aristocrats. At least the old schoolAriasto knew they got their money from their country, here, one country makes as nice a log to burn in the furnace as another.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
7. right up there with
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 03:02 PM
Oct 2014

Obama's "these people are bitter so they cling to guns and religion."

And both Hillary and Obama are hated because , at least in these quotes, they spoke the DAMN TRUTH!

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
9. yep a have a few friends on FB that come from small towns,
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 04:18 PM
Oct 2014

who've lived all their lives like this and have never been anywhere else. Tis fun however to burst they're balloons though. Got this from one of them:

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=509362525860946&fref=nf

Now that was a fun POP!

 

gunboatguy

(6 posts)
11. Hillary and the truth.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 12:43 PM
Oct 2014

I beg to differ, my father, father in law, and wife all worked hard started businesses and hired people. Jobs that did not exist before
were created by their hard work and persistence. Lets not drive this train off the tracks with falsehoods and half truths. I worked
for 35 years for a company that was run by the 3rd and 4th generations of a family that started a business that grew to employ
many hundreds of folks. Hillary Clinton has to appeal to the least of us to hold off Senator Warren. Make no mistake about where
her heart is, right in the middle of the big money fat cats that run this country, and they know it.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
12. as someone from a family of shopkeeps
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 01:00 PM
Oct 2014

I will tell you that the right conditions have to be set up for those buisnesses to make the jobs, conditions that are very, very unllike what the fats cats want. Yes, your father and my father did work their ass off, and did hire people, but unless the cimmunity was behind us, and unless the govt was protecting us from the fatscats, we woul be just another place where a Wal mart went up.

That is no half truth.

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
14. I don't deny
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 01:16 PM
Oct 2014

that small businesspeople work hard and have to be very resourceful to make it work. I am arguing that businesspeople are not gods. Some of our big entrepreneurs seem to get very angry at the fact that they are not worshipped as the sole "creators" of prosperity. I don't detect that sort of anger in this post, but look: the energy companies claim, in a recent big commercial buy, that THEY create jobs that use energy. Wall street bankers claim that THEY create jobs by lending money. I'm just saying that all these people who say that THEY are the creators of jobs are equally correct. And since they cannot all be correct ....

(By the way, this is an old issue in economics. It is called the imputation problem. Conventionally we rely on "marginal productivity." On that basis, nobody can be responsible for 100%.)

 

gunboatguy

(6 posts)
16. And where is Hillary rubbing elbows
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 09:06 PM
Oct 2014

Hillary has become a tool of the 1%. That's where the money come from to run for president. We are running on empty when it come to real leadership.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
18. Hillary is explaining the simple economics of demand. Any company who does not
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 02:08 PM
Nov 2014

have any customers and is not selling a service or product is not going to be hiring anyone and will probably be closing the doors. If more of the middle class had larger wages then we would be spending more money, creating more demand, increased sales to companies, ergo, an increase in products and services whereby more employees to provide the products and services. This is opposite of Reagan economics, the trickle down failure we live with today.

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
19. Well yes, but
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 05:53 PM
Nov 2014

I think there are two different things, here. Trickle-down is a failure, agreed. But the issue was: can one or another of those who cooperate to meet human needs and wants claim to have been the only "creator" of that cooperative activity? All the talk about "job creators" creates more confusion than anything else.

Response to rogerashton (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Hillary is right. Busines...