Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,593 posts)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 10:57 PM Apr 2012

Repsol’s numbers are ‘false’ and caused ‘great damage’ to the Argentine economy

Thursday, April 26th 2012- 01:21 UTC
Repsol’s numbers are ‘false’ and caused ‘great damage’ to the Argentine economy

Planning Minister Julio De Vido and Deputy Economy Minister Axel Kicillof, who head the audit investigating investments made by YPF, currently in the process of expropriation, denied on Wednesday that Repsol had invested more than 20 billion dollars, as the Spanish company had stated in full page ads published in the Argentine press on Tuesday.

“Repsol’s investment was insufficient because it triggered a reduction of production and reserves of YPF, leading to an important damage for the company and the country,” the communiqué stated.

“It is false” that the Spanish Repsol, the company that the government is aiming to expropriate the 51% of YPF, has invested more the 20 billion dollars between 1999 and 2011, it continued.

Likewise Economy Minister Hernán Lorenzino proved wrong some of the data published by Spanish company Repsol regarding oil and gas production since YPF was taken over, highlighting “the damage to the Argentine economy”.

More:
http://en.mercopress.com/2012/04/26/repsol-s-numbers-are-false-and-caused-great-damage-to-the-argentine-economy

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Repsol’s numbers are ‘false’ and caused ‘great damage’ to the Argentine economy (Original Post) Judi Lynn Apr 2012 OP
Repsol didn't pay off the right people Demeter Apr 2012 #1
It's really difficult to believe in Repsol. ocpagu Apr 2012 #2
Investments are down naaman fletcher Apr 2012 #3
 

ocpagu

(1,954 posts)
2. It's really difficult to believe in Repsol.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 02:05 AM
Apr 2012

I've been reading and researching a lot about this lately, and I found some interesting data.

In 1995, before the privatization, YPF investments in oil explorations were larger than Petrobrás' (Brazilian state oil company): U$ 2.36 billion x U$ 2.14 billion. Also, the average costs of prospections were way lower in Argentina than in Brazil (where most part of the oil comes from deep waters). By that year, both countries had practically the same level of daily production: 720,000 oil barrels.

After the privatization, the investments in the YPF only dropped, not only in comparison to Petrobrás', but also in absolute numbers: in 1998, Petrobrás invested U$ 3.8 billion, while YPF investd U$ 1.5 billion (only 63% of what it had invested three years before).

In 2003, Petrobrás investments grew to U$ 5.6 billion. In the same year, YPF investments dropped even more, to U$ 819 million.

In 2011, Petrobrás investments reached U$ 37 billion. YPF's, U$ 2.8 billion (10% less than in 1995, discounting the inflation).

In the second half of the 1990s, oil was cheap, but Petrobrás was purchasing a national policy of reduction of foreign dependence of imported oil, investing heavely in production, despite its profits being quite lower in comparison to global oil market. At the same time, instead of being a tool for the development of the Argentine nation, YPF was merely used as a "milking cow". Repsol only purchased the quickest profit possible. There was absolutely no interest in long term investments. Even when the price of the oil barrel started to grow in the middle of the 2000s, Repsol - heavily indebted - continued with its policy of few investments in Argentina, using YPF only for repatriation of profits.

For Argentina, the outcome was a catastrophic failure of its oil system.

Between 2003 and 2011, Petrobrás's production jumped from 1.8 million barrels to 2.6 million barrels, making Brazil become self-sufficient in oil. The reserves grew from 9.2 billion of barrels to 15 billion of barrels (not considering the pre-salt reserves, which could sum 150 billion barrels). Argentina's reserves, on the other hand, dropped from 3 billion of barrels to 2.4 billion of barrels. YPF's daily production fell from 329,000 of barrels in 2003 (which is already less than half of their daily production a decade earlier) to 194,000 of barrels in 2011.

The result: Argentina, which used to sell oil to Brazil and traditionally enjoyed a sizeable surplus in oil trade, nowadays has to import oil. Their surplus was replaced by a deficit of U$ 4.1 billion in 2011 and is estimated to grow to U$ 7 billion in 2012.

If that is not "damaging the Argentine economy", I don't know what it is.

If there is some contribution from the Spanish corporations "investing" in Latin America, it's defintely the fact they are proving that the neoliberal myth of private companies being more profitable, organized, and competent than public companies is 100% bullshit. I hope Telefónica is the next. I can't stand their incompetence any longer.

 

naaman fletcher

(7,362 posts)
3. Investments are down
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 05:33 AM
Apr 2012

Because of argentinian price control. If repsol drills in argentina it can only sell the oil for something like 60 dollars per barrel. If it drills in brazil it can sell for the market price.

So, if Argentina wants to run a loser oil company that can't compete in the long run because it has to sell it's oil at 40% less than everyone else, so be it.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Repsol’s numbers are ‘fal...