Latin America
Related: About this forumShadows of the Weimar Republic: What’s Really Happening in Venezuela?
February 18, 2014
Shadows of the Weimar Republic
Whats Really Happening in Venezuela?
by CHRIS GILBERT
Caracas, February 16, 2014.
Venezuelas traditional Youth Day fell on Wednesday of last week, and President Nicolás Maduros 10-month-old government had planned a sizable celebration in the city of La Victoria (Aragua State) where exactly 200 years ago to the day the national hero José Félix Ribas led a youth militia against the royalist army. The celebration included new monuments, military marches, a special light show, and performances by the youth orchestra all in a triumphalist spirit that was understandable given the electoral victories of last year. These victories establish what one analyst calls an electoral plateau during the upcoming two years: a period in which, without being distracted by campaigns, the new President and cabinet can concentrate on governing until late 2015.
Yet on that day Maduro made a serious error of judgment. Celebrating in Aragua, he had left his rearguard exposed in Caracas, while at the same time underestimating the oppositions desperation and willingness to resort to violence. In the capital city, the opposition had organized its own youth march, composed largely of white, middle-class students, drawn from the private universities. Near the end of the day a group of these protesters turned violent, attacking the Attorney Generals offices in the city center with stones, bricks, and Molotov cocktails. When night had fallen, three people lay dead and a great many more were wounded, among the latter a significant number of the new human-rights-trained police.
President Maduros response to these events could be called multilevel, but perhaps is more accurately described as shotgun-style. He continued with the ceremonies in La Victoria, hesitant to abandon them on short notice. Then, at around 8 pm, he addressed the nation on television as he would do on the following days indicating that those responsible for the violent acts were small fascist groups; that there was a coup attempt in process; adding later that the intellectual authors of the violence were the ex-mayor Leopoldo López and to a lesser degree the congresswoman María Corina Machado. Maduro also tried to associate the states response to this situation with a new government-organized pacification movement Por La Vida y Por La Paz, that is directed against criminal violence.
The incongruent elements in the Presidents message were readily apparent. If the responsible parties are really isolated fascist groups, how can they hope to carry out a successful coup détat? Again, since the events of Wednesday constitute political violence, why respond to it with a movement that is specifically directed against criminal violence? In fact, it is unlikely that there could be a coup under way in Venezuela in the near future, because the violent groups are too small and do not have the support of the military (as even the Washington Post article of the following day begrudgingly admitted). This raises the question of what the opposition groups, who continued to create disturbances over the weekend, are really trying to achieve.
More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/02/18/whats-really-happening-in-venezuela/
eridani
(51,907 posts)What is Happening in Venezuela?
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/03/04-7
Last December, Venezuela held municipal elections that the opposition purposely turned into a referendum on the Maduro presidency. Despite the oppositions winning of several important areas in Caracas and the city of Maracaibo the government sponsored coalition (Polo Patriotico) won over 70% of the countrys municipalities. The election results revealed that the opposition had not won over the majority despite the countrys serious economic problems and the loss of the charismatic Hugo Chávez as leader of the left.
Coming on the heels of a recent electoral defeat the protest by the opposition in early February caught many by surprise. Even though Venezuela has held 19 elections since 1998, with the left winning18, there are actually no elections scheduled during 2014, a rarity in the countrys active electoral cycle. The earliest elections are scheduled for December 2015 when voters will go to the polls to elect members of the National Assembly. The presidential recall provision of the constitution cannot be triggered until 2016.
It quickly became obvious that segments of the radical right wing were not willing to wait for the democratic process to unfold. The opposition feared that the government might make have time to address the very real problems that Venezuela faces, including food shortages, inflation that has reached over 56% and crime that takes a toll on all sectors of society. Therefore it should not come as a surprise that when Leopoldo López, (the political figure who hoped to capitalize on the protest and replace Capriles as the de facto leader of the opposition) was asked how long the protest should last, he responded, hasta que se vaya until Maduro leaves.
This is not the first time the opposition has resorted to extra-parliamentary means to
<snip>
Venezuela is not facing a Ukraine like crisis as some in the opposition have suggested. The president retains support throughout the country. Neither is it on the verge of a fratricidal conflict similar to what has taken place in Syria. A large part, but apparently not a majority of the society remains bitterly alienated from the government. Undoubtedly, Venezuela faces real economic and social problems. However, opposition efforts to topple the government will only exacerbate these problems and continue to raise tensions in the country.
On the international front, countries like Brazil and Argentina have called for no foreign intervention in Venezuela, an allusion to United States support of the opposition. Despite recent tensions, and the mutual expulsion of diplomats, the Maduro government recently extended an olive branch by naming a new Venezuelan ambassador to Washington. The countries have not formally had ambassadors since 2008. The U.S. has not formally responded to the gesture. The U.S. however has expressed concern over a potential new immigrant wave from the Caribbean if Venezuela curtails or ceases the sale of oil through Petro-Caribe to the countries of the region.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)In Libya, Syria, Venezuela, Ukraine, all starting out with peaceful protests then somehow morphing into violence, with, often, armed right wing groups taking over.
Almost as if there is a playbook somewhere, first exploiting genuine issues that are a real concern to the people, but after the people, in countries like Venezuela and Unkraine, have spoken.
The similarities are striking ....
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Armies love them too for the same reason.
The purpose is to prevent the opposition from dissipating in the next two years. Which suggests that someone does fear that Maduro will make progress. And that sort of contradicts the propaganda.