Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,592 posts)
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 08:36 PM Feb 2015

Why Is Henry Kissinger Walking Around Free?

Weekend Edition February 6-8, 2015

Handcuff Him Already

Why Is Henry Kissinger Walking Around Free?

by ANDY PIASCIK


On September 11, 2013, hundreds of thousands of Chileans solemnly marked the 40th anniversary of their nation’s 9/11 terrorist event. It was on that date in 1973 that the Chilean military, armed with a generous supply of funds and weapons from the United States, and assisted by the CIA and other operatives, overthrew the democratically-elected government of the moderate socialist Salvador Allende. Sixteen years of repression, torture and death followed under the fascist Augusto Pinochet, while the flow of hefty profits to US multinationals – IT&T, Anaconda Copper and the like – resumed. Profits, along with concern that people in other nations might get ideas about independence, were the very reason for the coup and even the partial moves toward nationalization instituted by Allende could not be tolerated by the US business class.

Henry Kissinger was national security advisor and one of the principal architects – perhaps the principal architect – of the coup in Chile. US-instigated coups were nothing new in 1973, certainly not in Latin America, and Kissinger and his boss Richard Nixon were carrying on a violent tradition that spanned the breadth of the 20th century and continues in the 21st – see, for example, Venezuela in 2002 (failed) and Honduras in 2009 (successful). Where possible, such as in Guatemala in 1954 and Brazil in 1964, coups were the preferred method for dealing with popular insurgencies. In other instances, direct invasion by US forces such as happened on numerous occasions in Nicaragua, the Dominican Republic and many other places, was the fallback option.

The coup in Santiago occurred as US aggression in Indochina was finally winding down after more than a decade. From 1969 through 1973, it was Kissinger again, along with Nixon, who oversaw the slaughter in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. It is impossible to know with precision how many were killed during those four years; all the victims were considered enemies, including the vast majority who were non-combatants, and the US has never been much interested in calculating the deaths of enemies. Estimates of Indochinese killed by the US for the war as a whole start at four million and are likely more, perhaps far more. It can thus be reasonably extrapolated that probably more than a million, and certainly hundreds of thousands, were killed while Kissinger and Nixon were in power.

In addition, countless thousands of Indochinese have died in the years since from the affects of the massive doses of Agent Orange and other Chemical Weapons of Mass Destruction unleashed by the US. Many of us here know (or, sadly, knew) soldiers who suffered from exposure to such chemicals; multiply their numbers by 1,000 or 10,000 or 50,000 – again, it’s impossible to know with accuracy – and we can begin to understand the impact on those who live in and on the land that was so thoroughly poisoned as a matter of US policy.

More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/06/why-is-henry-kissinger-walking-around-free/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Is Henry Kissinger Walking Around Free? (Original Post) Judi Lynn Feb 2015 OP
Good question. Power is my guess; and powerful 'friends' in high places. nt Mnemosyne Feb 2015 #1
His friends have to be an entirely unwholesome group of ghouls. n/t Judi Lynn Feb 2015 #3
Exactly. nt Mnemosyne Feb 2015 #5
Because nobody with power hates him Demeter Feb 2015 #2
People with power seem to dispise anyone who tries to help the helpless, suffering poor. Judi Lynn Feb 2015 #4
Sure there is: Psychopath Demeter Feb 2015 #6

Judi Lynn

(160,592 posts)
4. People with power seem to dispise anyone who tries to help the helpless, suffering poor.
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 01:20 AM
Feb 2015

That's way beyond "perverted." There's just not a word to cover them.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Why Is Henry Kissinger Wa...