Latin America
Related: About this forumArgentine Gov't moves to nationalize railways
Buenos Aires Herald
Published March 1, 2015
President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner announced that the Executive Power will sponsor a bill to nationalize the countrys railways during her speech at the opening of the 133th congressional period.
I would like to tell all lawmakers that I will deliver a bill for the State to recover the management of Argentinas railways, Ms. Kirchner said. I am not moved by a nationalization zeal. It is simply about improving efficiency. We will save additional 415 million pesos ($48 million), she vowed.
At: http://www.buenosairesherald.com/article/183239/govt-moves-to-nationalize-railways
-----------------
Argentina's railways - at 21,000 mi the most extensive in Latin America - were privatized by way of operating concessions 20 years ago. While most freight lines were kept running, all but 6,000 mi or so of commuter rail services were discontinued.
They were privatized gratis because the rationale at the time (heartily endorsed by the IMF and AEI types) was that privatizations would free the state from the rail system's $1-2 million in daily losses - but by 2011 "privatized" rail required $4 million in daily subsidies, with no improvement in quality and 100,000 laid off employees to boot. Numerous lines were already renationalized (i.e. the concessions rescinded) in 2013, and services in these lines have improved dramatically. This announcement just finishes a job long overdue.
Judi Lynn
(160,616 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)I mean, you gotta love those profitizations: sweetheart deals that entitled privatized firms to receive hefty subsidies indefinitely, as was the case of the railways, with no enforcement of investment (or even fee) obligations in return. That's "free market reform" for you.
To put in broader context, around $24 billion were earned by privatizations in Argentina during the 1990s. But around $15 billion of that was in the form of Brady Bonds that were worth 60 cents or less on the dollar, meaning that the Argentine state earned at most $18 billion (most of which went to debt repayment, at 10% interest, anyway).
A Bank of England audit requested by Menem himself, found that Argentina's 300 state-owned enterprises had $1 trillion in assets at the time the privatization drive began in 1990 (!).
Nice work if you can get it!
Judi Lynn
(160,616 posts)He's a slick one, all right.
They could have used him working for Argentina, rather than himself and his patrons.
Simply ghastly.
Thanks for the real news. Wow.
forest444
(5,902 posts)That figure was so high because it included underground oil, gas, and some mineral resources owned by YPF, YCF, Gas del Estado, Minera Carolina, etc. That's were the best "deals" were probably made, and you'll be happy to know all except Carolina and part of the gas company have been recovered.
Even taking that into account, the $24 billion (somewhat less if you include built-in Brady Bond losses) was less than half of the privatized firms' book value. At the time this was justified with the rationale that by letting them plunder a little, foreign investment would "pour in." ( )
Qué será.
Judi Lynn
(160,616 posts)So sad, and they do it again, and again.
So good to learn there was a recovery. Thanks.