Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,621 posts)
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 06:10 AM Aug 2015

The Secret Agenda Behind the Venezuela-Guyana Conflict

August 24, 2015
The Secret Agenda Behind the Venezuela-Guyana Conflict

by Eva Golinger

It all began in 1835 when the British Empire sent a German-born naturalist and explorer to conduct geographical research in the South American territory it had colonized and named British Guiana. In the course of his explorations, a map was drawn that well-exceeded the original western boundary first occupied by the Dutch and later passed to British control. Sparking the interest of the Empire’s desire to expand its borders into the area west of the Essequibo River that was rich in gold, the British government commissioned the explorer to survey their territorial boundaries. What became known as the “Schomburgk Line”, named after the explorer, Robert Hermann Schomburgk, usurped a large portion of Venezuelan land, and provoked the beginning of a territorial dispute that has remained unresolved to this day.

In 1850, after decades of arguing over the boundary line dividing Venezuela from its colonized neighbor, both sides agreed not to occupy the disputed territory under further determinations could be made. But as the demand for gold and other natural resources grew in the region, the British again tried to claim the territory declaring the Schomburgk Line the frontier of British Guiana, in clear violation of the previous accord with Venezuela.

. . .

In May 2015, just as Guyana was swearing in a new president, the conservative military officer David Granger, a close U.S. ally, Exxon was making a huge discovery in the Atlantic Ocean near the Venezuelan coast. According to reports, the deposits found by Exxon in the ’Liza-1 well’ hold over 700 million barrels of oil, worth about $40 billion today. The find could be a major game changer for Guyana, representing more than 12 times its current economic input, that is, if the oil actually belonged to Guyana instead of Venezuela.

. . .

The main conundrum of figuring out how to replace Venezuelan oil in PetroCaribe was resolved with the stroke of a pen by Guyana’s new president, a former instructor at the U.S. Army War College who made a secret trip to the United States just three days after taking office in May. Hours later, Exxon’s oil exploration rig, Deepwater Champion made its first major lucrative discovery in the large Stabroek Block in the disputed coastal territory.

More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/08/24/the-secret-agenda-behind-the-venezuela-guyana-conflict/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Marksman_91

(2,035 posts)
4. Hmm, wonder what you'd think about all the other Caribbean nations
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 01:10 PM
Aug 2015

Pretty much all of them are backing Guyana, even though they all enjoyed sucking off that Venezuelan oil teat. Guess that's what happens when you can't keep on giving other nations free oil. Everybody wants something in return.

Judi Lynn

(160,621 posts)
5. For someone who never took the time to learn, the tradition of discounted oil to poor countries
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 09:18 PM
Aug 2015

started LONG before Hugo Chavez was elected, as the rest of the LA forum knows.

From any search, the following information will be available. This one already posted early this year in this forum:



From www.LatinPetroleum.com

Top Petroleum News
Mexico and Venezuela renew San Jose Accord
By EFE
Aug 4, 2004, 17:55

Mexico and Venezuela renewed the San Jose Accord whereby the two oil producing nations supply a total of 160,000 barrels a day of crude to 11 Central American and Caribbean nations at discount prices.

The document was signed simultaneously in Mexico and Venezuela by Presidents Vicente Fox and Hugo Chavez, according to a joint communique. The San Jose Accord came into existence on Aug. 3, 1980, and it has never been suspended.

The countries that benefit from the special crude prices are Barbados, Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Panama and the Dominican Republic, the communique noted. The pact also establishes "a cooperation mechanism to promote the economic and social development of the beneficiary nations."

The cooperation accord finances social-economic development projects in the participating nations, as well as trade of goods and services by Mexican and Venezuelan firms. Mexico and Venezuela each provide half of the total 160,000 barrels per day of the crude sold at discount prices.


http://www.latinpetroleum.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=17&num=3542&printer=1

For the thinking impaired, this started long, long before Hugo Chavez was elected in December, 1998.
[center]~ ~ ~[/center]
Here's how the old Venezuelan government treated to the poor countries dependent upon its discounted oil:

2 LATIN NATIONS ACT TO CURB OIL FOR BELLIGERENTS
By RICHARD J. MEISLIN , Special to the New York Times
Published: August 4, 1984

MEXICO CITY, Aug. 3— Mexico and Venezuela said today they would halt delivery of discount- priced oil to any Central American and Caribbean countries ''that initiate warlike actions'' against others in the region. The announcement by the two nations said they were adopting the policy to provide incentive for ''preservation of peace'' as well as for strengthening ''democratic and social development.'' A Foreign Ministry spokesman here said the condition for further oil deliveries would not be retroactive. It will be up to Mexico and Venezuela, he said, to determine whether a country should be put under sanction.

Addition to 4-Year-Old Pact

The condition was a new feature in the four-year-old San Jose pact, which is renewed annually. Under the San Jose agreement, Mexico and Venezuela provide generous credit terms for oil to 10 Central American and Caribbean countries. The pact gave no indication which countries might be put under sanction for ''warlike actions.'' El Salvador, Honduras and Costa Rica, along with the United States, have accused Nicaragua of backing actions against the three Central American countries. Nicaragua has accused Honduras of supporting rebels seeking to topple its Government.

Several Countries Benefit

All these countries benefit from the San Jose accord, as do the Dominican Republic, Barbados, Belize, Guatemala, Jamaica and Panama. The pact, which takes its name from the Costa Rica capital where it was signed, provides oil to participating countries for a payment of 80 percent of market rates. The remaining 20 percent can be paid back over a period of five years at an interest rate of 8 percent or, if it is to be used for development programs, over 20 years at a rate of 6 percent. Under the new pact, the program would be authorized to ship 130,000 barrels of oil a day, down from 160,000 under the 1983-84 agreement.

Contadora Group's Aims Cited

Mexico and Venezuela said sanctions against aggressive actions would be an effort to ''take every effort necessary for the complete fulfillment of the Contadora Group.''

Colombia, Mexico, Panama and Venezuela - the members of the Contadora Group, named for the island where they met - have been trying for more than 18 months to negotiate an agreement among the Central American countries, a key element of which would commit them to refrain from directly or indirectly backing attacks on neighboring countries. Mexico and Venezuela did not specify how a decision to apply sanctions would be made, saying only that they would ''suspend application of this program to participating countries that initiate warlike actions against other states of the area, in violation of the Charter of the United Nations.'' They also did not say whether a country found to have committed ''warlike actions'' would lose its Mexican and Venezuelan oil supplies entirely or only the credit subsidies.

U.S. Praise Awkward for Mexico

The changes come at a time when United States officials have been praising Mexico - to the embarrassment of its officials - for having moderated its support of leftist groups in Central America. The Government of Mexico denies any substantive change in its foreign policy.

More:
http://www.nytimes.com/1984/08/04/world/2-latin-nations-act-to-curb-oil-for-belligerents.html
 

Marksman_91

(2,035 posts)
6. This still hasn't answered how you feel about other Caribbean nations supporting Guyana
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 12:46 AM
Aug 2015

Are tou saying that all these Caribbean nations backing Guyana are part of some U.S.-backed conspiracy to topple Venezuela despite how generous the Chavista regime has been to them? Is that what you're implying?

By the way, nice use of another well-known paid-for shill of the Venezuelan government. I thought we established already that Eva Golinger is just another propaganda-spewing entity along with Absence of Logic, Telesur, and VenezuelaAnalysis, and that hack of an "economist" Mark Weisbrot

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»The Secret Agenda Behind ...