Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Tue Oct 9, 2012, 03:14 PM Oct 2012

Supreme Court refuses to block Chevron's $18.2 billion verdict for pollution in Ecuador

Supreme Court refuses to block Chevron's $18.2 billion verdict for pollution in Ecuador
Reuters mercurynews.com
Posted: 10/09/2012 11:57:40 AM PDT
October 9, 2012 6:59 PM GMTUpdated: 10/09/2012 11:57:41 AM PDT

WASHINGTON -- Chevron on Tuesday lost a U.S. Supreme Court bid to block an $18.2 billion Ecuadorian judgment against the San Ramon oil company in a case over pollution in the Amazon jungle.

A lower court threw out an injunction blocking enforcement of the judgment in January. Chevron appealed to the Supreme Court, which rejected the appeal without explanation.

The decision is the latest in a nearly two-decade conflict between Chevron and residents of Ecuador's Lago Agrio region over claims that Texaco, bought by Chevron in 2001, contaminated the area from 1964 to 1992. The battle has spawned litigation in numerous courts both inside and outside the United States.

Oil companies are watching the case closely because it may affect other cases accusing companies of polluting the areas where they operate.

More:
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_21732872/supreme-court-refuses-block-chevrons-18-2-billion?source=rss

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court refuses to block Chevron's $18.2 billion verdict for pollution in Ecuador (Original Post) Judi Lynn Oct 2012 OP
I should hope so! Demeter Oct 2012 #1
Classic case of Corporate Musical Chairs. Peace Patriot Oct 2012 #2
They must not have had ANY choice... but to let the judgement stand. Agony Oct 2012 #3
So we are getting to the "Try to Collecct" phase now. nt bemildred Oct 2012 #4

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
2. Classic case of Corporate Musical Chairs.
Tue Oct 9, 2012, 05:30 PM
Oct 2012

It reminds me of ES&S gobbling up Diebold, actually.*

Texaco gets themselves a great big stinking liability in Ecuador (toxic oil pollution over an area of rainforest the size of Rhode Island), and Chevron gobbles them up with a view to shedding the liability. The case was in court in the U.S. and Chevron moved it to Ecuador, because they thought they could control the courts in Ecuador. The U.S. judge made them promise to pay up if they lost their case in Ecuador and agreed to the change of venue. But, lo and behold--despite all the legal shenanigans and "dirty tricks" of batteries of the highest paid lawyers in the world--and despite the poverty of their victims, they lost the case. Now, of course--because they couldn't rig the courts in Ecuador--they have reniged on their promise to pay any judgement against them in Ecuador.

The Indigenous tribes whose lives and health were ruined did not give up. It's been almost two decades and they're still trying to get their health care covered and the spills cleaned up (as far as possible--it's a disaster, really).

---------------------

*(ES&S--a corporation with far right connections that would make your hair stand on end--thus got themselves a 70% monopoly over the 'TRADE SECRET' code voting systems in the U.S. And, believe me, they have used that illicit power over voting results and will do so again. And Diebold's notoriety has been buried, and our people thus put to sleep about the gravest menace that our democracy has ever faced.)

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Supreme Court refuses to ...