Latin America
Related: About this forumPanetta Down South: The Pentagon’s New Plan to Confront Latin America’s Pink Tide
October 19-21, 2012
Panetta Down South
The Pentagons New Plan to Confront Latin Americas Pink Tide
by NICK ALEXANDROV
U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta was in Uruguay recently, where he spoke of the need to strengthen the southern hemispheres police forces. This proposed policy has a precedent, almost unknown in this country, but potentially indicative of what awaits Latin American governments willing to cooperate with their northern neighbors defense establishment. In the 1960s, Washington initiated a decade-long training program for Uruguays police, helping transform them from a weak, underfunded force into an efficient instrument of repression. The metamorphosis coincided with Uruguays descent from democracy to dictatorship, as the Switzerland of Latin America became, by the time the U.S. had finished its work, the worlds leader in political prisoners per capita.
Panetta delivered his remarks at Punta del Este, where the Alliance for Progress was launched in 1961. Aimed at raising income levels and promoting land reform in Latin America, President Kennedys program reflected his agenda accuratelyto about the same extent Obamas handshake with Chávez heralded a friendly turn in U.S.-Latin American relations. Down here on Earth, Obama ensured the current Honduran regime stole the last election successfully. In the frauds aftermath, death squads roam the country, murdering human rights lawyers and activists. The Kennedy administration, for its part, oversaw the write-up of a development plan for Uruguay within the Alliance framework, which was effectively discarded upon completion. None of its recommendations were ever carried out, since other matters took priority. In 1962, Kennedy created the Office of Public Safety (OPS), supervised loosely by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and responsible for Uruguays Public Safety Program (PSP) from 1964-1974.
The PSP was a training program for Uruguays police, who received instruction both in the U.S. and their home country, part of the general effort to combat rising urban terrorism and crime. Or at least that was the authorized rationale. U.S. government documents, meanwhile, tell a different story. Half a year after the program began, for example, USAID officials in Montevideo explained that Uruguay has enjoyed a relatively peaceful state of security for many years, and that [n]o active threat of insurgency exists. In the 2012 version of this story, Panetta offers drug traffickers and insurgents as the twin dangers necessitating revamped police squads. But if the past is any guide, these claims should be met with extreme skepticism.
The Tupamaros, a left-wing political group, are often considered the main target of the PSP. They spent their first few years organizing, and raiding banks and weapons caches for funds and guns. They next started kidnapping top officials, beginning with the head of the state telephone companywho was also President Jorge Pacheco Arecos close friend and adviserin August 1968. But the guerrillas took their hostage only after Pacheco cracked down on left-wing periodicals and political parties, declaring a state of emergency that allowed the government to make use of its special powers at will. The fact that Uruguays democracy was unraveling had been pointed out by a number of observers several years before. One of these noted in 1965 that, while a pair of political parties have dominated the Uruguayan scene for over 100 years, they were effectively identical, characterized by little difference of policy. These parties shared aims did not include taking action to remedy the continuing industrial recession, rising unemployment
and a spiraling cost of living underway at the time. The radical implications of this analysiswhich was the CIAsare obvious: to improve Uruguayan lives, actions had to be taken outside the established political channels, given that the two major parties were doing nothing, and in fact promoting, the deepening austerity. The Tupamaros, of course, agreed with the CIA on this point, but these groups diverged in their visions for the future. While the rebels wished to see conditions improve within the context of a better social order, Washington wanted to prevent Uruguayans from even protesting the continuing industrial recession through which they suffered.
More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/10/19/the-pentagons-new-plan-to-confront-latin-americas-pink-tide/
Judi Lynn
(160,630 posts)It's well worth noting:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101645149
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Agony
(2,605 posts)What is it going to take to kill this tool of empire?
Judi Lynn
(160,630 posts)annually against their actions, and regardless of all the U.S. American people they've thrown in prison for expressing their opposition to their deadly impact upon the people of the Americas.
Even when their infamous torture manual was exposed, it never slowed them down, not for a second.
Can only hope more countries will join the first ones in withdrawing from sending their people to Ft. Benning for SOA courses.