Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

navarth

(5,927 posts)
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 11:43 AM Oct 2012

Please help with straightening out a teabagger about the Rmoney Detroit bankruptcy

Hello friends, I need a tiny bit of help here regarding the mechanics of that proposed bankruptcy...I know our Governor Granholm says nobody was there to help out and of course I believe her. But I'm totally ignorant about these things and I'm wondering how that works. Did somebody have to be there to help out? To inject money?

I don't want to go to that discussion 'unarmed' and I feel pretty strong about Governor Granholm's comments being right on; but how would a Rmoney proposed bankruptcy have worked? Would there have to have been somebody there to inject money? Any advice is greatly appreciated. I don't want to wait too long before I address this.

I'm probably doing a shitty job of framing this question; apologies for that, I'm doing this on the sly at work. Thanks in advance.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
1. Simple answer: Romney bankruptcy would have relied on private credit 100%
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 11:46 AM
Oct 2012

Problem with that is there was none at the time and the auto business would have had to shut down.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
6. this is exactly what I need a bit of detail on, thanks
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 12:08 PM
Oct 2012

before I came to you guys I did some googling of bankruptcy, and I didn't see any mentions of requirements involving other people injecting money.

I want to be armed with as many facts as I can get. Thanks very much for your time.

 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
2. There Was No Private Money To Bail Them Out.
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 11:47 AM
Oct 2012

The industry would have just shut down. I would tell the teabagger to go F himself. That I don't respond, associate with or acknowledge a racist and a bigot. Why waste time with a POS.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
4. Thanks for replying, this private money thing is exactly what I'm wondering about
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 12:06 PM
Oct 2012

the private money would have been for a bail out, yes? isn't that different from the bankruptcy thing?

what I'm trying to address is these clowns thinking that a bankruptcy would have been better...but wouldn't that have meant shutting down the whole company?

see, I don't want to be asking these questions of the teabagger.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
3. Romney wanted to "harvest" Detroit
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 11:51 AM
Oct 2012

He and his billionaire buddies stood to make billions off a bankrupted auto industry.

Amy Goodman interviewed Greg Palast on "Democracy Now!" this a.m.

We turn now to a major new exposé on the cover of The Nation magazine called, "Mitt Romney’s Bailout Bonanza: How He Made Millions From The Rescue of Detroit." Investigative reporter Greg Palast reveals how Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney made some $15 million on the auto bailout and that three of Romney’s top donors made more than $4 billion for their hedge funds from the bailout. Palast’s report is part of a film-in-progress called, "Romney’s Bailout Bonanza." Palast is the author of several books, including recently released New York Times best seller, "Billionaires & Ballot Bandits: How to Steal An Election in 9 Easy Steps."

http://www.democracynow.org/2012/10/18/greg_palast_mitt_romneys_bailout_bonanza]

democrat_patriot

(2,774 posts)
7. Romney's 'plan' was to let them go through bankruptcy
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 12:33 PM
Oct 2012

and then have vulture capitalists come in and buy them (GM and Chrysler) at 10 cents on the dollar. Some BIG issues with that.

1. Nobody stepped up and said "Yeah, I'll buy them". Nobody, so they would have gone under.
2. OR - It would have killed 1 million decent paying jobs, replacing them $8 and hour 're-hires'.
3. People making $8 don't help the economy.

What Obama did was get concessions from both management (GM head stepped down), and workers gave up 30+% of their pensions and benefits.

And they survived.

Romney would have bankrupted them, and left them to die twitching on the floor.
 

julian09

(1,435 posts)
8. There was no money to be had from the private sector
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 01:11 PM
Oct 2012

The whole banking system was on the edge of the abyss, and had to be bailed out themselves. They couldn't take the risk.
At the time cars and large suvs, trucks were not selling, they had to have clash for clunkers program to get rid of inventory and selling at a loss.The govt was the only realistic source for a loan (bailout).

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
9. Entering into bankruptcy protection would have forced them
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 03:50 PM
Oct 2012

to sell off some of their operations to outfits like Bain, which would have then either dismantled them for profit after borrowing them into insolvency or sent them to China to profiteer on near slave labor.

It would also have neatly destroyed the pension system, throwing former workers out in the cold, with nothing but Social Security and bare bones Medicare to live on.

Romney would see this as a double gain: operations to be picked clean by his own company plus "unprofitable" workers cast aside completely, broken cogs to be thrown out with the garbage.

CEOs have no idea that their ideal world would be Dickensian in it's utter cruelty and lack of respect for human life. They never do see the human cost of their actions as they destroy jobs and with them lives.

And this is how you answer your right wing friend. Ask him how he would like to spend his own life: working for a living wage or living in total penury with nothing better to look forward to, ever, the fruits of his labor stolen again and again until he is too sick to work.

If the Republicans get in again, this is the process they will continue to pursue, the degradation of labor in favor of capital and the beggaring of 98% of American citizens.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
11. Just ask that Mittwit Teabagger how he would feel if Bain bought out his company.
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 04:56 PM
Oct 2012

Ask him if he would be more likely, or less likely to make a major purchase knowing that he is now working for a wholly-owned susidiary of Bain Capital.

They can't or won't answer the question.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
12. there's no talking to this fool.
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:12 PM
Oct 2012

I lost all hope of being able to get him to make sense when he started spouting about Obama not having 'christian values' and being a muslim.

I pounded him into the ground at that point and apologized to everybody else on the thread for not being patient. He didn't come back.

Thanks to all for your help. Your comments helped me to put Governor Granholm's comments into focus.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Please help with straight...