Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:57 PM Dec 2012

Revenues foregone due to cuts to top income tax brackets, since 1982: $8.4 Trillion

It's been noted that the top few percent started to distance themselves from the rest of us starting around 1980-82. In 1982 the tax rates started getting reduced - in particular for the highest tax brackets. The top marginal rates went from 70% in 1981 to 35% in 2003 (28% in 1988 to 31% in 1991 to 39.6% in 1993) (see wikiPedia). I thought I would see how much revenue we would have had if he top tax bracket income tax rates been held at the 1980 levels over the last 30 years. The number for the lost revenues I got came to $8.4 trillion.

I used Emanuel Saez (Univ of Calif. Berkeley) and Thomas Piketty's (Paris School of Economics) spreadsheet which provides the income distributions over the period from 1913 to 2010. I applied income tax rates for the ensuing years and compared the taxes paid (in theory) to the taxes that would have been paid if the 1980 rates applied for the entire period (1980-2010).

Here is the link to the spreadsheet for those interested: Tax Revenues foregone (1980-2010)
(note this is a big spreadsheet (mostly Saez and Piketty's work) so it may take a while to download to your computer)

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Revenues foregone due to cuts to top income tax brackets, since 1982: $8.4 Trillion (Original Post) Bill USA Dec 2012 OP
If you add interest to that Turbineguy Dec 2012 #1
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #2
you are ignoring the amount of jobs created due to these tax cuts DJ13 Dec 2012 #3
Didn't you know? The government doesn't actually hire anyone or buy anything. enki23 Dec 2012 #5
RIIIIIGHT! LOL!! (like in picture) Bill USA Dec 2012 #6
Tax cuts do not create jobs thelordofhell Dec 2012 #4

Response to Bill USA (Original post)

enki23

(7,790 posts)
5. Didn't you know? The government doesn't actually hire anyone or buy anything.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 09:15 PM
Dec 2012

Unlike our magnanimous private investors who never ever ever sit on their money or invest it stupidly or stash it overseas, the government just throws all that tax money in a hole and burns it. This inevitably leads to an actual decline in overall revenue while simultaneously giving rise to runaway inflation. It also led directly to the extinction of the fucking unicorn.

Just think of the ultrawealthy as golden geese. When they aren't chasing poor people off the golf course, they occasionally squeeze golden eggs out of their magical cloacae. Increasing the top marginal tax rate by a few percent is exactly like ramming a stick up a golden goose's cloaca to get at all that delicious gold. You're going to break the magic. Then, when society comes to a crashing halt, what the hell are you going to do with all those non-gold eggs? Eat them?

Whereas, the people who raise the goose food and clean up their not-golden shit are fucking parasites who don't do anything useful and so should be fucking grateful they aren't left to fucking starve. Unless they are, in which case they should just shut the fuck up and have the decency not to die on the fucking golf course.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Revenues foregone due to ...