Economy
Related: About this forumDecade of Court Cases Quietly Wiped from Online Database
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/08/28/decade-court-cases-quietly-wiped-online-databasePACER removes electronic copies of cases from five US courts with no warning in 'upgrade' to new system
Decade of Court Cases Quietly Wiped from Online Database
Nadia Prupis, staff writer
Thursday, August 28, 2014
A decade of records from four U.S. appeals courts and one bankruptcy court were lost earlier this month when the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) quietly deleted a massive amount of data that was "incompatible" with an impending upgrade.
"As of August 10, the following information will no longer be available on PACER," read a statement on the companys website, which was published after the files were wiped on August 11. The statement was re-written a few days later to say, "[T]he judiciary is no longer able to provide electronic access to the closed cases on those systems. The dockets and documents in these cases can be obtained directly from the relevant court."
The relevant courts in question are in New York City, Washington, D.C., Chicago, Atlanta, and Los Angeles. The Administrative Office defended the decision by noting that the cases that were removed were closed and that many had not been accessed in several years. Karen Redmond, a spokesperson for the Administrative Office, told Common Dreams, "Some of these cases have been closed for over 13 years. Anything that's open remains available at the courts."
But Brian Carver, co-founder of Free Law Project and an assistant professor at University of California at Berkeley School of Information, said many of the files were "very relevant and very recent" and others were landmark civil rights cases. "If these five courts don't provide some kind of accommodation... it will be extremely problematic for practitioners, for researchers, for the public who just want to find out about a big case," Carver told Common Dreams. "PACER is so difficult and so expensive that its usage statistics should tell us nothing about the importance of these files."
merrily
(45,251 posts)to publish court decisions. Well, really, I know of only one company.
Law firms and libraries, including government libraries paid big money for books containing court decisions from state supreme courts, federal district courts, federal circuit courts and, of course, the Supreme Court. I never understood why it sorted out that way. Taxpayers pay all the expenses of the court system, but didn't have free and easy access to court decision? And why couldn't government publish them, rather than make one company rich?
I imagine putting court decisions on the net cut into their business a lot. Whether that has anything at all to do with "quiet" deletions, I really don't know.
elleng
(130,964 posts)Surely the publishers weren't happy when we could more easily access decisions, but we paid/pay lexis/nexis too.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)(answer: all of it, when they have to be free and open; when it's YOUR dime, they got the rules to pound you with.)
Response to unhappycamper (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed