Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
Related: About this forumWhy Many Aren't Celebrating Low Unemployment
http://www.manufacturing.net/news/2014/11/why-many-arent-celebrating-low-unemployment?et_cid=4256286&et_rid=54679148&type=ctaBut the jobs report contains clues to why many voters shrugged off those positive trends.
Consider wages. Workers' pay usually outpaces inflation once the unemployment rate dips beneath 6 percent. That's because when fewer people need to look for jobs, employers must raise pay to attract the most desirable among them.
Even with 5.8 percent unemployment and even though more than five years have passed since the Great Recession officially ended, this phenomenon has yet to take hold. Most workers' pay is barely keeping up with historically low inflation.
"People aren't looking at the statistical aggregates," said Bill Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. "They care about their standard of living, and most Americans think their standard of living has declined."
Look, too, at the percentage of adults either working or searching for work. It's a measure called labor force participation. The government counts people without jobs as unemployed only if they're seeking work. If more people stop looking, labor force participation falls.
At 62.8 percent, the U.S. participation rate hasn't budged over the past 12 months. And it's down a sharp 3.6 percentage points from 2007. That means a lower proportion of Americans are engaged in the job market and benefiting from the economic upswing.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1005 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Many Aren't Celebrating Low Unemployment (Original Post)
eridani
Nov 2014
OP
K&R. I have difficulty believing the unemployment numbers the government provides.
JDPriestly
Nov 2014
#2
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)1. "Historically low inflation"
Yeah, right.
Every time I go back to the US, most of the things I buy on a regular basis seem to get more expensive. College and health care costs both seem to have increased by a factor of 10 in just the past 30 years or so. And then there is "volume deflation", which is an effort to keep the price the same by reducing the amount of product per container.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)2. K&R. I have difficulty believing the unemployment numbers the government provides.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)3. bencasselman For the 49th time in the past 50 months, more unemployed workers dropped out of the
...
@bencasselman
For the 49th time in the past 50 months, more unemployed workers dropped out of the labor force than found jobs.
...
That was September, 2014
https://twitter.com/bencasselman/status/507871461248618496/photo/1
?w=610&h=257
golfguru
(4,987 posts)4. "At 62.8 percent, the U.S. participation rate hasn't budged"
That nails it.
True unemployment =(1 - number of workers paying social; security tax / able bodies adults 21-65) x 100
Both numbers are readily available from gov't data. Not counting workers with expired unemployment benefits and discouraged workers makes the official number look much more rosy.