Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
Related: About this forumStop Calling the TPP a Trade Agreement — It Isn’t
http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/dave-johnson/62403/stop-calling-the-tpp-a-trade-agreement-it-isn-tStop Calling the TPP a Trade Agreement It Isnt
Corporate America | Economic Policy | Trade
by Dave Johnson | May 27, 2015 - 7:42am
This is a message to activists trying to fight the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Stop calling the TPP a trade agreement. TPP is a corporate/investor rights agreement, not a trade agreement. Trade is a good thing; TPP is not. Every time you use the word trade in association with the TPP, you are helping the other side.
Trade is a propaganda word. It short-circuits thinking. People hear trade and the brain stops working. People think, Of course, trade is good. And that ends the discussion.
Calling TPP a trade agreement lets the pro-TPP people argue that TPP is about trade instead of what it is really about. It diverts attention from the real problem. It enables advocates to say things like, 95 percent of the world lives outside the U.S. as if that has anything to do with TPP. It lets them say, We know that exports support American jobs to sell a corporate rights agreement. It enables them to say nonsense like this about a corporate rights agreement designed to send American jobs to Vietnam so a few investors can pocket the wage difference: Exports of U.S. goods and services supported an estimated 9.8 million American jobs, including 25 percent of all manufacturing jobs and those export-supported jobs pay 13 to 18 percent higher than the national average wage.
Trade is good. Opening up the border so you can get bananas and they can get fertilizer is trade because they have a climate that lets them grow bananas and you already have a fertilizer plant. Enabling companies to move $30/hour jobs to countries with $.60/hour wages so a few billionaires can pocket the difference is not trade.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 775 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stop Calling the TPP a Trade Agreement — It Isn’t (Original Post)
unhappycamper
May 2015
OP
daleanime
(17,796 posts)1. K&R....
true
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)2. That is absolutely correct
It is little more than an abominable attempt to enable certain corporations to shake every dollar/yen/peso/sol out of the 99%ers that they can.
djean111
(14,255 posts)3. Yup. Only five chapters are about trade.
Trade is good. Opening up the border so you can get bananas and they can get fertilizer is trade because they have a climate that lets them grow bananas and you already have a fertilizer plant. Enabling companies to move $30/hour jobs to countries with $.60/hour wages so a few billionaires can pocket the difference is not trade.
One of the most assiduous TPP pushers here is quite open about hoping and wanting American jobs to go elsewhere. The sad part is that Americans losing jobs will not raise the wages or working conditions anywhere else. The corporations are quite clear about that. They move jobs to save money, not to raise workers up.