Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 11:57 PM Nov 2015

Reich: Why the Sharing Economy Is Harming Workers – And What Must Be Done http://www.nationofchan

http://www.nationofchange.org/2015/11/27/why-the-sharing-economy-is-harming-workers-and-what-must-be-done/

Such uncertainty can be hard on families, too. Children of parents working unpredictable schedules or outside standard daytime working hours are likely to have lower cognitive skills and more behavioral problems, according to new research.

What to do?

Courts are overflowing with lawsuits over whether companies have misclassified “employees” as “independent contractors,” resulting in a profusion of criteria and definitions.

We should aim instead for simplicity: Whoever pays more than half of someone’s income, or provides more than half their working hours should be responsible for all the labor protections and insurance an employee is entitled to.

Say, for example, your monthly income dips more than 50 percent below the average monthly income you’ve received from all the jobs you’ve taken over the preceding five years. With income insurance, you’d automatically receive half the difference for up to a year.

It’s possible to have a flexible economy and also provide workers some minimal level of security.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reich: Why the Sharing Economy Is Harming Workers – And What Must Be Done http://www.nationofchan (Original Post) eridani Nov 2015 OP
I'm sorry, what? JayhawkSD Nov 2015 #1
 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
1. I'm sorry, what?
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 03:02 AM
Nov 2015
We should aim instead for simplicity: Whoever pays more than half of someone’s income, or provides more than half their working hours should be responsible for all the labor protections and insurance an employee is entitled to.

I'm opposed to the "independent contractor" thing, but this is not workable. Who determines where half of your income is coming from, and when and how do they determine it? If the determination is made at the beginning if the year and changes, what happens then? "We should aim instead for simplicity," you say. This is a snake pit of complexity.

Say, for example, your monthly income dips more than 50 percent below the average monthly income you’ve received from all the jobs you’ve taken over the preceding five years. With income insurance, you’d automatically receive half the difference for up to a year.

Let me see if I have this right. I average $1000 per month for five years. Then I have a year where I make only $500 per month. Then in the following year I make $2000 per month. So I should get half the difference for a year from the year that I dipped below the five year average by 50% but it can't, by your procedure, start until I have met the criterion of being low income for a year, so in the year that I make $2000 per month, twice what I was earning the first five years, I get a $250 monthly benefit.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Reich: Why the Sharing E...