Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:59 PM May 2016

Bank of North Dakota Soars Despite Oil Bust: A Blueprint for California?

A blueprint for ANY state.

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/05/02/bank-north-dakota-soars-despite-oil-bust-blueprint-california

Despite North Dakota’s collapsing oil market, its state-owned bank continues to report record profits. This article looks at what California, with fifty times North Dakota’s population, could do following that state’s lead.

In November 2014, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Bank of North Dakota (BND), the nation’s only state-owned depository bank, was more profitable even than J.P. Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs. The author attributed this remarkable performance to the state’s oil boom; but the boom has now become an oil bust, yet the BND’s profits continue to climb
. Its 2015 Annual Report, published on April 20th, boasted its most profitable year ever.

The BND has had record profits for the last 12 years, each year outperforming the last. In 2015 it reported $130.7 million in earnings, total assets of $7.4 billion, capital of $749 million, and a return on investment of a whopping 18.1 percent. Its lending portfolio grew by $486 million, a 12.7 percent increase, with growth in all four of its areas of concentration: agriculture, business, residential, and student loans.

By increasing its lending into a collapsing economy, the BND has helped prop the economy up. In 2015, it introduced new infrastructure programs to improve access to medical facilities, remodel or construct new schools, and build new road and water infrastructure. The Farm Financial Stability Loan was introduced to assist farmers affected by low commodity prices or below-average crop production. The BND also helped fund 300 new businesses.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bank of North Dakota Soars Despite Oil Bust: A Blueprint for California? (Original Post) eridani May 2016 OP
It's Not the Oil & Gas: The Bank of North Dakota Scores 12th year of Record Profits eridani May 2016 #1
Public Banking & the Nonpartisan League: Is It Time for a Financial Revolution? eridani May 2016 #2

eridani

(51,907 posts)
1. It's Not the Oil & Gas: The Bank of North Dakota Scores 12th year of Record Profits
Wed May 4, 2016, 03:48 AM
May 2016
http://www.opednews.com/articles/It-s-Not-the-Oil--Gas-Th-by-Scott-Baker-Bank-Of-North-Dakota_Bankers_Banking_Banks-160430-947.html

A Return On Investment (ROI) of 18.1% - without risky derivatives, out-of-state/out-of-country investments, securitization to naive 3rd parties - is something the Too Big To Fail banks can only dream of. And the BND has been getting returns like this for years, well before the post-2005 period when fracking began to push natural gas production to record levels in the state.

But still, many critics - on both the Right and Left, were skeptical of this deep Red State's bank with socialist roots in the now defunct Non-Partisan League , from its founding in 1919. Even when the bank celebrated nearly 100 years without a major scandal, while the major American banks were, and are, racking up billions of fines , year-after-year, some people and the mainstream media thought it was an anomaly, or a fluke of low population (North Dakota's population as of 2015 is: 756,927 , making it the 47th state by population. Other oil-rich states Alaska, ranked 48th and Wyoming, ranked 50th, have about double the rate of unemployment and lower rates of growth).

Note the conspicuous lack of lending in the oil sector. Though some local businesses do benefit from the economic effects of the oil and gas business, it is primarily the out-of-state big banks that lend to the large interstate oil and gas companies. And in any case, even at the peak of the oil & gas boom, it was the state which, rightly, collected the economic rent from those resources from the commons. Now, it's the state's turn to distribute some of those earnings, during the down times, while the BND continues to play its part, returning dividends to the state, including over $300m in one recent 10-year period, when the state's population still averaged less than 700,000 people.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
2. Public Banking & the Nonpartisan League: Is It Time for a Financial Revolution?
Wed May 4, 2016, 03:50 AM
May 2016
https://arizonapublicbanking.org/2016/05/01/public-banking-the-nonpartisan-league-is-it-time-for-a-financial-revolution/

What is public banking? Public banking is “banking in the public interest.” Wall Street banks make deals for the good of their wealthy shareholders. Public banks make deals for the good of their shareholder—us, the citizens. Public banking is using all or part of the state’s rainy day funds to partner with community banks to invest in the future by investing in education, infrastructure, entrepreneurship and small business development, and debt relief.

How do we do this? In a nutshell, the state bank self-funds interest-free infrastructure projects and (through community banks) offers affordable credit to local businesses, entrepreneurs, and college students.

Currently every city, county, and state in the US (except for North Dakota) holds its rainy day funds in a too-big-to-fail bank, and those funds are invested on Wall Street for the good of the bank’s shareholders—not for the good of the taxpayers. If a state or local government wants to build a road or fix the potholes, they borrow the money from Wall Street and pay interest and fees on that loan. Yes, we pay fees to Wall Street to hold our money, and we pay interest and fees when we want to use our money. Local and state governments are paying billions of dollars in financial fees each year. THIS IS A WASTE OF TAXPAYER FUNDS.

If the state took all or part of its rainy day funds and established a public bank, it could self-fund highways, bridges, education, economic development—without going into debt to Wall Street. If the state had a public bank, it could also help local governments by lending them money for improvements at a reasonable rate. The local governments would save money, the state would make a modest income on these loans, and all levels of government would be free of Wall Street debt. This is a sustainable economic loop. Giving away tax incentives is not sustainable. Giving affordable credit is sustainable. The City of Santa Fe recently did a public banking feasibility study. They found that they could buy back their bond debt and they could save $25 million over 10 years.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Bank of North Dakota Soar...