Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

antigop

(12,778 posts)
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 05:46 PM Jul 2013

The 2 Supreme Court cases that could put a dagger in organized labor

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/07/the-2-supreme-court-cases-that-could-put-a-dagger-in-organized-labor/277616/

In the shadow of the intense media coverage last month surrounding the Voting Rights Act, affirmative action, the Defense of Marriage Act, and Proposition 8, the justices quietly agreed to hear two cases that could devastate unions in the private sector.

The first case, Noel Canning v. NLRB, arises out of the dysfunction gripping the U.S. Senate. For years now, the chamber's Republican minority has refused to confirm presidential appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, the government agency that protects the union rights of workers. As a result, the NLRB has struggled to maintain the three-member quorum necessary for it to legally function. To circumvent Senate obstruction, President Obama has been forced to name new NLRB members during Senate recesses. To choke off these appointments, Senate Republicans have more recently refused to go into recess by seizing upon technicalities that keep the body perpetually in session.

Despite this maneuvering, President Obama continued to make recess appointments to the NLRB without seeking Senate confirmation. His administration has argued that the Senate goes into recess when it effectively shuts down, even if the Senate claims it is still in session. To finally resolve this conflict, the Supreme Court in the Noel Canning case will decide under what circumstances the President can make recess appointments to the NLRB. Given the conservative orientation of the present Supreme Court, it is entirely possible that these recess appointments will be ruled invalid.

Such a ruling would essentially give Senate Republicans a blank check to neuter the only agency empowered to enforce the country's labor laws.

A non-functional NLRB would, for instance, leave workers illegally fired or intimidated by employers during union organizing drives with nowhere to turn. Additionally, without an NLRB to resolve union election disputes, unions may find it nearly impossible to become the certified representatives of new groups of workers. It is hard to imagine any union successfully organizing new workers under these conditions.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The 2 Supreme Court cases that could put a dagger in organized labor (Original Post) antigop Jul 2013 OP
1877. aquart Jul 2013 #1
k&r for labor. n/t Laelth Jul 2013 #2
And here we go again. Lugnut Jul 2013 #3
Rec'd. Couple this with the TPP and kiss it all goodbye n/t Catherina Jul 2013 #4

aquart

(69,014 posts)
1. 1877.
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 05:53 PM
Jul 2013

Flaming, bloody labor unrest from sea to shining sea. It was a healthy respect for that which led to our current protections. How much fire insurance do the rich guys have?

Lugnut

(9,791 posts)
3. And here we go again.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 01:11 AM
Jul 2013

We've already fought these battles that we're fighting again. Those who lost their lives in those struggles many years ago have died in vain.

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
4. Rec'd. Couple this with the TPP and kiss it all goodbye n/t
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 02:10 PM
Jul 2013
Private sector unions are already in decline. But this is the one-two punch that could cripple them for good.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»The 2 Supreme Court cases...