Shocker! Workers Don't Actually Abuse Paid Sick Days
http://www.aflcio.org/Blog/Economy/Shocker!-Workers-Don-t-Actually-Abuse-Paid-Sick-Days
03/25/2014Kenneth Quinnell
http://www.aflcio.org/var/ezflow_site/storage/images/site_aflcio/blog/economy/shocker!-workers-don-t-actually-abuse-paid-sick-days/3387911-5-eng-US/Shocker!-Workers-Don-t-Actually-Abuse-Paid-Sick-Days_blog_post_fullWidth.jpg
When you hear a conservative argument as to why we can't pass a policy that helps working families, you are pretty safe in assuming that it won't stand up to closer examination. In today's example, the topic is paid sick days. Extremist pro-business groups that oppose requiring that paid sick days be offered to employees often make the cynical argument that if paid sick days are offered, workers will exploit and abuse them and that will hurt businesses. The real-world evidence, not surprisingly, says otherwise.
The largest real-world sample of data we have on paid sick days is the state of Connecticut, which required businesses to provide paid sick days in 2011. A recent examination of what has happened in the state since then shatters numerous right-wing myths about paid sick leave, particularly the claim that the policy will be abused by workers. The new policy in Connecticut made the number of available paid sick days for the average worker rise from 6.9 days to 7.7 days. Of those workers who have taken paid sick leave, the average worker has used only four of those days. And about one-third of workers used no paid sick days at all.
As Alan Barber of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) concludes:
Sign up to receive AFL-CIO Now blog alerts>>
[The evidence] stands in direct opposition to the idea that workers would abuse the policy and take as many days off as possible, even when not sick. This suggests that employees view paid sick days as a form of insurance, to be used only as needed. Even when additional days are available to them, employees, in reality, only take the time off from work that they require when they are ill or need to care for a family member.
Once again, real-world evidence rejects a conservative claim used to oppose a policy to help working families. This has happened so many times now, it'd be safe for us to assume these extremist arguments are faulty, at best, and just go ahead and help workers instead.
Jgarrick
(521 posts)Glad it was there...!
mokawanis
(4,441 posts)I've banked a lot and it will help pay health insurance when I retire.
Great info, thanks for posting!
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)although we are "allowed" to use vacation time as well if needed. There is no accumulation of either as it is paid out at the end of each year as a bonus and taxed at a higher rate.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)The policy then was that you did not get paid for your first three days of sick leave, and if you were out longer you were expected to bring in a note from a doctor about your illness.
I'd say we all tended to call in sick every so often, whether we were actually sick or simply needed a mental health day, and we greatly resented the fact that we weren't being paid.
Later on I worked for an airline. The sick time was a separate bank from vacation time. When I left the job after 10 years I left behind more than 100 unused sick days. No, I did not get paid out for any of that. I vowed then I would never ever leave sick time behind.
I'm getting ready to leave my current job, and we have a combined leave, where I'm getting 26 days a year (the number increases at the 5 year and 10 year point) and I currently have 127 hours accrued. I'll be paid out for the unused time. So much better.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I still to this day feel stupid. I would recommend people use their leave balance a year before they decide to go elsewhere (if possible).
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I was honestly very healthy, so I had very little need to use sick days, and since I did shift work (airline ticket agent at an airport) I was acutely aware that if I called in sick someone else had to work extra to cover me. The other girls I worked with weren't that considerate. I recall one time having a four-day weekend as my scheduled time off and working three of the four days because of other girls calling in sick.
I was a complete fool to not use more of my time. As I said, it would never happen again, and my current employer will pay out at my full hourly rate my unused leave time when I retire in three weeks.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)purely coincidental
and I have never built up "sick leave"
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Precisely!
Thanks for posting & the link!