Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Modern School

(794 posts)
Thu May 24, 2012, 08:39 PM May 2012

California School Pressures Parents to Buy IPads

The American Civil Liberties Union (ALCU) is challenging an elementary school’s drive to put technology into the hands of every student, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported this week. Tierra Bonita Elementary School, in Poway, California has initiated a technology program requiring every fourth and fifth grader to have an iPad or similar tablet-style computer. Students were given the choice of using their own device, buying one from the district for $379 (plus $79 warranty and $25 case), or renting or borrowing one from the district.

The problem with their program, according to the ACLU, is that they warned parents the program would be halted if more than 10% of families had to borrow a device. Furthermore, the principal told parents “We are just 15 commitments away from being the first school in Poway to equip all students in 4th and 5th grade next year with a digital device. If you have not turned in a response, we need you.”

The ACLU is arguing that the email and survey “go far beyond assessing interest” by placing “significant pressure on families to either provide or pay for a digital device. This pressure is dangerously close if not tantamount to directly charging an illegal fee...”

While one could easily come up with numerous pedagogically sound ways to use personal tablets in the classroom and for homework assignments, the real driving force behind the “laptops for every child” movement is lobbying by the tech and textbook companies which stand to profit handsomely from it (see here and here).

It is also a boondoggle for school districts. Sure, they could put all their textbooks on one laptop instead of issuing many books to each student. However, they (or their students) would still be responsible for upkeep and maintenance, which could quickly become prohibitively expensive if students treat their tablets as carelessly as many treat their paper textbooks.

As a high school science teacher, when I think about what my students really need to succeed, personal laptops or tablets are pretty low on the list. Those who are struggling most in my classes are the ones who lack the prerequisite skills to succeed in a college preparatory level science class. They lack these skills not because they lack computers, but because they lack proficiency in reading, math, English language and study skills. What difference does it make whether they are having trouble reading from a textbook or an ebook?

While the ACLU is probably taking the correct stand on this, the case is symptomatic of a much bigger problem in education: We continue to gut K-12 funding and then waste what little is left on lame solutions to nonexistent or exaggerated problems. How can anyone think it makes sense to fire and furlough teachers, balloon class sizes, eviscerate support services and then try to compensate for these losses and also shrink the achievement gap by purchasing laptops or tablets for every student?

Modern School
http://modeducation.blogspot.com/2012/05/california-school-pressures-parents-to.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California School Pressures Parents to Buy IPads (Original Post) Modern School May 2012 OP
wow. You said it very well. Lifelong Protester May 2012 #1
one ipad gives one access to tens of thousands of books abelenkpe May 2012 #2
The school could apply for grants to get these proud2BlibKansan May 2012 #3
From paragraph #1: "...or renting or borrowing one from the district. " NYC_SKP May 2012 #5
Not where I teach proud2BlibKansan May 2012 #11
I think that within the next 30 years, all American kids will get their educations TheDebbieDee May 2012 #4
I feel sorry for you if all your roody May 2012 #7
Like I told a poster in another thread, don't get defensive......... TheDebbieDee May 2012 #8
So do you want to bust all unions? roody May 2012 #9
I don't want to bust any unions.......You are completely missing my point. TheDebbieDee May 2012 #10
I get your point. And I think it's a likely scenario. proud2BlibKansan May 2012 #12
And why iPads? Goblinmonger May 2012 #6

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
2. one ipad gives one access to tens of thousands of books
Thu May 24, 2012, 09:02 PM
May 2012

not to mention apps designed by educators that help students like my son who has dyslexia. It is the future. Should the school force parents to buy them? No. They should be issued like textbooks.

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
3. The school could apply for grants to get these
Thu May 24, 2012, 09:12 PM
May 2012

How stupid to force the parents to buy them. If my school did that, our parents would laugh.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
5. From paragraph #1: "...or renting or borrowing one from the district. "
Sat May 26, 2012, 06:57 PM
May 2012

Which, I think, makes it equitable for low SES families.

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
11. Not where I teach
Sun May 27, 2012, 02:53 PM
May 2012

Many of our kids don't bring school supplies because their families can't afford them. If there was a cost attached to renting an iPad, they wouldn't pay.

A grant would be the best solution. There are lots of technology grants available. We just put Eno boards in all of our classrooms with a grant.

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
4. I think that within the next 30 years, all American kids will get their educations
Sat May 26, 2012, 05:49 PM
May 2012

this way.

After going to school 5 days a week and completing kindergarten and the first, second and third grades where children learn crucial basic education and socialization skills and how to use the computer equipment, students will be issued a laptop with wi-fi and will be expected to do their reading and complete their assignments and courses via internet.

The students will be given codes to access a site, the same site, where they will watch a video of an instructor, for example, explain how to solve a particular type of math problem. The student will be allowed to watch the video as many times as necessary until he/she is able to work the problem.

If he/she still cannot work the problem after several viewings, the student can ask for more help and then be given a different video with perhaps a different instructor who has a different schpiel (sp) for solving the same type of math problem.

At the end of each course, the student will take a final exam over the course matter. The results of the exam will show that either the student needs to repeat the course or that the student can advance to the next course.

The student will only need to go the brick and mortar school if the student participates in extracurricular activities like the chess club or band or the choir.

This will turn out to be a very cost-effective method of educating children who can learn this way - all of the students in the district/county/state will be provided an identical educational curriculum. However, students with learning disabilities or other issues will be SOL unless their parents can afford to pay for additional educational services.

Of course, none of this home-schooling plan can be implemented until and unless the teachers' unions are broken up! Only teachers' unions can prevent the educational system from saving billions of $ by reducing their classroom jobs to giving a series of video-taped lectures that are viewed by class after class after class of students.

This type of educational system is already in effect at Devry University, University of Phoenix and other colleges and universities. this system can very easily be adapted to work for and with younger children.

I think this is why the role of teachers in US society has been so under fire for the last 10 or 15 years. The people who want to develop this "class-less" educational system have to make parents and school districts WANT to get rid of "bad" teachers (they want to smear all of you teachers as bad and overpaid) so that they can offer their alternative.

But, like I said, they have to get rid of teachers' unions first...........

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
8. Like I told a poster in another thread, don't get defensive.........
Sun May 27, 2012, 03:19 AM
May 2012

Attacking me for for putting forth my theory won't make the threat go away.

I'm not proposing that on-line public education is a good thing. I'm just saying that with the technology that is available today that it is a good bet that on-line public education will become the norm if and when teachers' unions are taken down. That's why teachers and teachers unions are under attack.

Teachers' unions are the only thing that's keeping some of these school districts from making deals with these on-line providers now.........

Privatization of law enforcement and other public services like fire-fighting and mail delivery are the reason why those unions and the US Postal Service is under attack as well.

Step back and look at the big picture - it's not just about teachers.

roody

(10,849 posts)
9. So do you want to bust all unions?
Sun May 27, 2012, 11:36 AM
May 2012

Or only teachers'?

Not feeling defensive, but it would be sad if all one's teachers ever did was lecture. That is the least effective teaching strategy.

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
10. I don't want to bust any unions.......You are completely missing my point.
Sun May 27, 2012, 12:53 PM
May 2012

I said that teachers' unions are standing in the way of the on-line education industry's attempts to offer this plan to school districts as an alternative.

And that is why teachers' unions and other public service unions are being dragged thru the mud with the negative PR..........

The industry's aim is to get rid of these unions so that they can get rid of the teachers, cops, fire-fighters and US Postal Service employees and replace them with privatized workers who may be willing to do the same jobs for $8.00/hour.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
6. And why iPads?
Sat May 26, 2012, 07:04 PM
May 2012

Why not just have a BYOD (bring your own device) policy with the option to rent/borrow some devices from the school. iPads don't run flash and that's a pretty big deal. iPads are not the device that will help middle school and high school students.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»California School Pressur...