Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 09:38 PM Jul 2012

Sorry. There is no way someone like THIS should be in front of a classroom

Gotcha.

He's actually a hero that got fired and threatened w. prosecution by NYC school reform bureaucracy for advocating for special needs kids.

I posted this earlier in the day( in GD) under a sympathetic header and and it went down like the Lusitania. I'm curious to see if the general DU public simply prefers to read about teachers who are molestors, abusers and malingerers. The response to this might be edifying.

Truth is... this guy's much more typical of the folks I work with. Except for MUCH BRAVER.



From yesterday's NY Times:

>>For speaking up, Mr. Lirtzman — who served as a deputy New York State comptroller before turning at age 53 to public-school teaching — saw his career ground to dust. He was denied tenure, and the principal, Grismaldy Laboy-Wilson, asked him to leave immediately. When he took his worries to the investigative arm of New York City’s Education Department, the investigators opened a file on him instead.

I wrote of Mr. Lirtzman’s struggle in May. His vindication arrived in the mail in June.

The State Education Department investigated his charges and sent him a copy of its report. It sustained Mr. Lirtzman’s allegations, one violation of state regulations after another.>>>>>

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/07/nyregion/state-backs-up-accusation-by-harris-lirtzman-bronx-teacher-on-special-education-gotham.html?_r=1

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sorry. There is no way someone like THIS should be in front of a classroom (Original Post) Smarmie Doofus Jul 2012 OP
"...He was denied tenure, and xxqqqzme Jul 2012 #1
I know someone who worked in the building. Smarmie Doofus Jul 2012 #2
So far this header is kicking my "pro-teacher" header's ass. Smarmie Doofus Jul 2012 #3
you have to be prepared to die if you do this. I know from personal roguevalley Jul 2012 #4
I taught elementary school for 30 years. livvy Jul 2012 #5
You are so right proud2BlibKansan Jul 2012 #6
I agree... livvy Jul 2012 #8
Here's a blog about him. proud2BlibKansan Jul 2012 #7

xxqqqzme

(14,887 posts)
1. "...He was denied tenure, and
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 09:50 PM
Jul 2012

the principal, Grismaldy Laboy-Wilson, asked him to leave immediately.

The Council of School Supervisors and Administrators, which represents principals, argues that the fault lies with the city’s Education Department,....approved Ms. Laboy-Wilson’s decisions, including placing substitute teachers in special education classrooms on a rotating basis.

The principal, they say, is not at fault.

Well, if she asked him to leave immediately instead of backing him - then Oh, yes, she is.

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
2. I know someone who worked in the building.
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 10:00 PM
Jul 2012

The principal is of a particular variety, that is heavily favored by the corporate NYC ed "reform" bureaucracy these days: 30 yrs old, mba-type, no ( or next to no) teaching experience.

Bloomberg and Co encourage this sort of thing. It's an actual policy. They want principals to be "managers" ... in the corporate mold. Autonomous, data-obsessed, anti-teacher, anti-student, anti-parent.

Autocratic. Answerable only to the next creature up the corporate food chain.

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
3. So far this header is kicking my "pro-teacher" header's ass.
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 10:24 PM
Jul 2012

193 hits in less than an hour. Compared to 137 in about 10 hours.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002916431


What does it mean, what does it mean , what does it all mean.

I don't think it's a particularly good sign.

livvy

(6,948 posts)
5. I taught elementary school for 30 years.
Mon Jul 9, 2012, 10:21 AM
Jul 2012

During the last 10 years or so, I had many special ed kids added to my class as part of the least restricted environment part of their IEP's. Each year the kids that were added had more severe disabilities. Although I agree that students should be included as much as possible in a regular classroom environment, I often felt frustrated and totally unprepared for their inclusion. I was not trained to work with these kids. I never took any special ed classes in either my undergrad or masters program, as this was not an area of interest, nor did I expect to have the need. I was on a learn as you go basis, and if not for one special education teacher's very much appreciated assistance, I could have floundered. I never felt it was right to have someone like me, untrained, not certified in special education, and with no prior experience be responsible for the best care for these kids. I made it through each year, and I loved these kids just as much as any (after all, every child has special needs), but I always worried that I was doing them a disservice in some way. There were a couple of years, I felt too, that the non-certified kids got the short end, as so much of my time and energies were spent on the included kids. These were years that I had 3 or more certified kids in the class with pretty high learning disabilities, and one year with a child with some severe behavioral issues.
Before anyone jumps on me, I very strongly believe that all children deserve the best education possible. I also believe that children with special needs do benefit greatly from inclusion with others that aren't certified as special need children, and I think those children benefit from having them in their classrooms as well. I learned a lot working with these kids, tried to do my best, and found their successes rewarding as hell. My only concerns were my qualifications, failing them in my inexperience, and the few times that I felt they interfered with the education of the other children in the class.
The article brought to mind how often special needs kids are done a great disservice, especially when they are placed in classrooms where teachers are overwhelmed, under-trained, and either unmotivated or unable, due to overcrowding, underfunding, etc. to learn how best to help them get the education they need.
In reading the main post, I was struck by how insane it was for penalizing this educator for trying to do the right thing for the kids, and the loss of a great teacher. What a shame.

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
6. You are so right
Mon Jul 9, 2012, 10:54 AM
Jul 2012

They dump more and more sped kids in general ed all the time. Thy claim it's about mainstreaming but I think it's actually about saving money. And it stinks.

My hat's off to this teacher in the OP. He did the right thing.

livvy

(6,948 posts)
8. I agree...
Mon Jul 9, 2012, 07:58 PM
Jul 2012

It's not fair to the kids, their parents or the teacher. The district I taught in was pretty affluent, and it was a problem at times. I can only imagine how much worse it is in less affluent, or downright desperate for cash districts. Keep that money rolling to the top. Heaven forbid our tax dollars or investments should come back to fund our needs.
Nice to "see" you again!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Sorry. There is no way so...