Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sue4e3

(731 posts)
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 05:13 PM Apr 2016

Save the Polar Bears? They’re Fine, Actually

Two years ago, following guidance from the U.S. Geological Survey, the federal Fish and Wildlife Service officially listed the polar bear as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. The idea is that global warming will reduce—or even eliminate—sea ice in the Arctic Ocean at the end of summer, and this is where the bears go fishing.

But recent scientific findings (as well as some older ones) show that the polar bear has survived several millennia with little or no sea-ice. The ruling was clearly based upon less than the totality of science, and we should hope that the Survey’s new chief, Suzette Kimball, who was schooled in the proud tradition of the Survey to put “science first,” will see fit to advise the Fish and Wildlife Service to de-list the bears.

This Earth Day, it’s time to give the polar bear the respect it deserves. Nothing humans can do to the climate is going to wipe it out.

That’s because we can’t change the Arctic as much as Nature has during the bear’s existence.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/patrick-j-michaels/polar-bears-earth-day_b_9752044.html?utm_hp_ref=climate-change

This point of view does not necessarily reflect my own

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Save the Polar Bears? They’re Fine, Actually (Original Post) sue4e3 Apr 2016 OP
Hopefully a few will survive angstlessk Apr 2016 #1
At least hang on until the ammunition runs out ... Nihil Apr 2016 #2
when I read this my first thought was, just because a few survived sue4e3 Apr 2016 #4
Patrick Michaels works at the Cato Institute hatrack Apr 2016 #3
That explains the "Nothing humans can do can really change/harm" meme cprise Apr 2016 #6
Survived or thrived? NickB79 Apr 2016 #5
 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
2. At least hang on until the ammunition runs out ...
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 05:40 AM
Apr 2016

... and then they can regenerate with our "help"



sue4e3

(731 posts)
4. when I read this my first thought was, just because a few survived
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 09:10 AM
Apr 2016

does not make it a win, win situation that's like when I hear people say not all humans will die from climate change ( like this is something hopeful) I guess it just sucks to be you if your one of the other billions.

cprise

(8,445 posts)
6. That explains the "Nothing humans can do can really change/harm" meme
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:01 PM
Apr 2016

Its very common in libertarian and conservative circles.

So polar bear numbers are diving, but they're "fine". Lets also ignore that those past warm periods gave polar bears and most other life much longer timeframes in which to adapt.

NickB79

(19,247 posts)
5. Survived or thrived?
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 12:20 PM
Apr 2016

"Hey look, a few dozen polar bears made it through a population bottleneck 100,00 years ago! So it's fine if we wittle their numbers down to that level again, right?"

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Save the Polar Bears? The...