Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Sun May 22, 2016, 05:26 PM May 2016

Energy-Storing Train Gets Nevada Approval

http://fortune.com/2016/05/22/energy-storing-train-nevada/
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Energy-Storing Train Gets Nevada Approval[/font]

by David Z. Morris | @davidzmorris

May 22, 2016, 12:39 PM EDT

[font size=4]Startup will build a better grid by pushing heavy railcars up a hill.[/font]

[font size=3]One of the biggest challenges of the shift to renewable energy like solar and wind is energy storage. The wind or sun don’t always generate power exactly when it’s needed, so infrastructure needs to bridge the gap. Batteries are the most frequently discussed solution, but there are other options out there, many of them surprisingly low-tech.

In April, the Nevada Bureau of Land Management granted environmental approval and a land lease to Advanced Rail Energy Storage (ARES), a startup with an energy storage solution that’s both novel and old-school. Apparently taking some inspiration from the myth of Sisyphus, ARES proposes to use excess off-peak energy to push a heavily-loaded train up a grade. Then, when the grid needs that energy back, the cars will be rolled back down the slope—but in a significant improvement on the myth, that return trip will generate energy and put it back on the grid.

ARES’ solution is related to an already common kind of energy storage known as pumped-storage hydropower, which pumps water uphill, then captures the power of its downhill flow as needed. The obvious advantage of the ARES approach is that it’s more adaptable, without the need for lots of water. ARES has also said its solution costs about half as much as other storage technologies, and claims 80% efficiency in energy reclamation, similar to or slightly above typical hydro-storage efficiency.[/font][/font]



http://vimeo.com/75895781
http://vimeo.com/48344799
http://vimeo.com/48546631
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Energy-Storing Train Gets Nevada Approval (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe May 2016 OP
Pumped-storage hydropower is just evil scscholar May 2016 #1
Might you explain why dumbcat May 2016 #2
Not all pump-storage generation requires a dam... NeoGreen May 2016 #3
These are the sorts of schemes that make nuclear power look reasonable. hunter May 2016 #4
 

scscholar

(2,902 posts)
1. Pumped-storage hydropower is just evil
Sun May 22, 2016, 06:09 PM
May 2016

I'm glad we're tearing down four more hydroelectric dams in the NW, as I read about here on April 7th, and the plan for another pumped-storage dam was abandoned.

hunter

(38,317 posts)
4. These are the sorts of schemes that make nuclear power look reasonable.
Mon May 23, 2016, 01:46 PM
May 2016

I loved the cameo by Zond's Jim Dehlsen.

Dehlsen sold his wind empire to Enron. Most of the wind power systems Zond installed (way back when I was enthusiastic about these alternative energy schemes) have become dangerous scrap metal and lubricant spills.

Not pretty.

Scarring even more hillsides with this sort of crap doesn't make the world a better place.






Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Energy-Storing Train Gets...