Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dead_Parrot

(14,478 posts)
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 02:42 PM Mar 2012

Earth warming (wait for it...) Faster Than Expected

By 2050, global average temperature could be between 1.4°C and 3°C warmer than it was just a couple of decades ago, according to a new study that seeks to address the largest sources of uncertainty in current climate models. That's substantially higher than estimates produced by other climate analyses, suggesting that Earth's climate could warm much more quickly than previously thought.

Many factors affect global and regional climate, including planet-warming "greenhouse" gases, solar activity, light-scattering atmospheric pollutants, and heat transfer among the land, sea, and air, to name just a few. There are so many influences to consider that it makes determining the effect of any one factor—despite years and sometimes decades of measurements—difficult.

Daniel Rowlands, a climate scientist at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, and his colleagues took a stab at addressing the largest sources of short-term climate uncertainty by modifying a version of one climate model used by the United Kingdom's meteorological agency. In their study, the researchers tweaked the parameters that influence three factors in the model: the sensitivity of climate to changes in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the rate at which oceans absorb heat from the atmosphere, and the amount of cooling from light-scattering aerosols in the atmosphere.

Then the team analyzed the results of thousands of climate simulations—each of which had a slightly different combination of parameters—that covered the years between 1920 and 2080, Rowlands says. All of the simulations assumed that future concentrations of greenhouse gases would rise from today's 392 parts per million to 520 ppm by 2050. Each of the runs also allowed for variations in solar activity (which would affect how much the sun's radiation warms Earth) and rates of volcanic activity (which would influence the concentrations of planet-cooling sulfate aerosols in the atmosphere).


More: http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/03/earth-warming-faster-than-expected.html
Paper (sub): http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ngeo1430.html
Also:
(BBC) Temperatures could rise by 3C by 2050, models suggest
(UKPA) [link:http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5ha41ZeHeRd2ThK1tN5hlXc187qAg?docId=N0086561332645330672A|Fears of 3C global warming by 2050
]
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Earth warming (wait for it...) Faster Than Expected (Original Post) Dead_Parrot Mar 2012 OP
The planet has a fever. We wouldn't ignore it if we had a fever. We wouldn't deny it. Gregorian Mar 2012 #1
She just has a bad case of the humans. Get rid of those parasites and she'll be OK Champion Jack Mar 2012 #2
republican war on Terra. (nt) chknltl Mar 2012 #3
That's exaclty why I hate that metaphor. Viking12 Mar 2012 #5
Sorry, I was out of town XemaSab Mar 2012 #4
Just wait until the sea ice is gone. Not much longer. joshcryer Mar 2012 #6

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
1. The planet has a fever. We wouldn't ignore it if we had a fever. We wouldn't deny it.
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 03:33 PM
Mar 2012

We'd take the day off work.

Viking12

(6,012 posts)
5. That's exaclty why I hate that metaphor.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 07:44 AM
Mar 2012

It's completely misanthropic when carried to its logical conclusion.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Earth warming (wait for i...