Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 10:20 AM Aug 2016

Fail-Safe Nuclear Power—but not in the United States

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/602051/fail-safe-nuclear-power/
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Fail-Safe Nuclear Power[/font]

[font size=4]Cheaper and cleaner nuclear plants could finally become reality—but not in the United States, where the technology was invented more than 50 years ago.[/font]

by Richard Martin | August 2, 2016

[font size=3]In February I flew through the interior of a machine that could represent the future of nuclear power. I was on a virtual-reality tour at the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics in China, which plans in the next few years to build an experimental reactor whose design makes a meltdown far less likely. Inside the core—a superhot, intensely radioactive place where no human will ever go—the layers of the power plant peeled back before me: the outer vessel of stainless steel, the inner layer of a high-tech alloy, and finally the nuclear fuel itself, tens of thousands of billiard-ball-size spheres containing particles of radioactive material.

Given unprecedented access to the inner workings of China’s advanced nuclear R&D program, I was witnessing a new nuclear technology being born. Through the virtual reactor snaked an intricate system of pipes carrying the fluid that makes this system special: a molten salt that cools the reactor and carries heat to drive a turbine and make electricity. At least in theory, this type of reactor can’t suffer the kind of catastrophic failure that happened at Chernobyl and Fukushima, making unnecessary the expensive and redundant safety systems that have driven up the cost of conventional reactors. What’s more, the new plants should produce little waste and might even eat up existing nuclear waste. They could run on uranium, which powers 99 percent of the nuclear power plants in the world, or they could eventually run on thorium, which is cleaner and more abundant. The ultimate goal of the Shanghai Institute: to build a molten-salt reactor that could replace the 1970s-era technology in today’s nuclear power plants and help wean China off the coal that fouls the air of Shanghai and Beijing, ushering in an era of cheap, abundant, zero-carbon energy.

Over the next two decades China hopes to build the world’s largest nuclear power industry. Plans include as many as 30 new conventional nuclear plants (in addition to the 34 reactors operating today) as well as a variety of next-generation reactors, including thorium molten-salt reactors, high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (which, like molten-salt reactors, are both highly efficient and inherently safe), and sodium-cooled fast reactors (which can consume spent fuel from conventional reactors to make electricity). Chinese planners want not only to dramatically expand the country’s domestic nuclear capacity but also to become the world’s leading supplier of nuclear reactors and components, a prospect that many Western observers find alarming.

The Shanghai Institute’s effort to develop molten-salt reactors, a technology that has sat all but forgotten in the United States for decades, reflects just how daring China’s nuclear ambitions are. Already, the government has invested some two billion Chinese renminbi ($300 million) over the last five years in molten-salt R&D. Building actual plants will require tens of billions more. As with other innovative nuclear technologies in development around the world, there are few guarantees: though people have run small, experimental molten-salt reactors, no one’s ever actually built one at utility scale and hooked it up to the grid. Yet the Chinese government expects to have a commercial-size plant up and running within 15 years, helping to revive the beleaguered nuclear power industry.

…[/font][/font]
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fail-Safe Nuclear Power—but not in the United States (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Aug 2016 OP
Okay, this article is about molten salt reactors, so what's up with the billiard balls? hunter Aug 2016 #1
They are doing it in steps: first, solid fuel with molten salt coolant; later, liquid fuel. bananas Aug 2016 #2

hunter

(38,328 posts)
1. Okay, this article is about molten salt reactors, so what's up with the billiard balls?
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 01:38 PM
Aug 2016

It sounds as if the author confused a computer simulation of a pebble bed reactor with the molten salt reactor the rest of the article describes. It strikes me odd that the "hybrid" reactor described later on in the article would use "billiard ball" fuel elements. But maybe China has a stockpile of these fuel elements manufactured for previous experimental reactors.

The photo of the Fermi reactor is misleading too. Chicago Pile-1 was the first nuclear reactor to achieve criticality. The reactor pictured was an experimental test rig built prior to Chicago Pile-1.

Chicago Pile-1:




bananas

(27,509 posts)
2. They are doing it in steps: first, solid fuel with molten salt coolant; later, liquid fuel.
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 01:53 PM
Aug 2016

Last edited Tue Aug 2, 2016, 02:35 PM - Edit history (3)

From the article in the OP:

To start, the Shanghai Institute plans to take a hybrid approach, using molten salt to cool a solid-fuel core similar to the ones in conventional nuclear plants. Then, Chen says, the team will progress to liquid fuels to fully realize the technology’s potential for safety and efficiency. At first the fuel will be uranium, but the Chinese engineers plan to shift later to thorium.

The time lines are aggressive, at least by the standards of the nuclear industry. The Shanghai Institute aims to start up a commercial-scale solid-fuel plant by 2030 and a 100-megawatt demonstration liquid-fuel reactor by 2035. Much of the current work, Chen told me, focuses on solving the complex plumbing challenges associated with the highly corrosive molten salt. I was struck by the confidence and idealism of the young scientists working at the institute—an optimism not seen in U.S. nuclear circles since Weinberg’s day.


edit to add:
You wrote:
It strikes me odd that the "hybrid" reactor described later on in the article would use "billiard ball" fuel elements. But maybe China has a stockpile of these fuel elements manufactured for previous experimental reactors.


China is still developing pebble bed reactors:
https://www.rt.com/news/332254-china-meltdown-free-reactor/

China plans to open 1st ‘meltdown-free’ nuclear power plant by 2017
Published time: 12 Feb, 2016 11:57
Edited time: 12 Feb, 2016 12:00

China says it is planning to bring a safe nuclear power plant that will not suffer from meltdowns online in November 2017. It would be the world’s first high-temperature, gas-cooled pebble-bed nuclear plant built on an industrial scale.

China’s Nuclear Engineering Construction Corporation wants to introduce a high temperature, pebble-bed, gas-cooled nuclear reactor, in the Shandong Province, south of the capital, Beijing. The company is planning to bring twin 105-megawatt reactors online that would be immune to meltdown. It is hoped that the power station will start working by November 2017.

The Chinese are using a design developed in Germany, though the nuclear reactor which is being built in Shandong will be the first commercial-scale atomic power plant of its kind to be constructed.

“This technology is going to be on the world market within the next five years,” said Zhang Zuoyi, director of the Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Technology Review reported. “We are developing these reactors to belong to the world.”

<snip>


Another link points out these are intended mainly for export:
http://www.neimagazine.com/features/featurechinese-reactor-design-evolution-4272370/

Chinese reactor design evolution
22 May 2014 Caroline Peachey

<snip>

In December 2012, first concrete was poured for the HTR-PM demonstration power plant, a 200 MW commercial demonstration plant based on the HTR-10. The small HTR-PM units with pebble bed fuel and helium coolant are 2x105 MWe reactors, so that they can retain the same core configuration as the prototype HTR-10. The twin units, each with a single steam generator, will drive a single steam turbine.

The HTR-PM project is being managed by Huaneng Shidaowan Nuclear Power Co. Ltd (HSNPC), which comprises China Huaneng Group (via subsidiary Huaneng Nuclear Power Development Co, 47.5%), China Nuclear Engineering Group (32.5%), and Tsinghua University (20%).

As of the end of 2013, the civil work for the underground part of nuclear island buildings had been completed. The main components, including reactor pressure vessels, core internals and steam generators are being fabricated by domestic manufacturers. A fuel factory that will supply 300,000 fuel elements each year to the HTR-PM is also being built in northern China. According to the project schedule HTR-PM is expected to be commissioned in 2017.

China's future choice of nuclear technology?

What is the plan for future nuclear power development in China, and what will be the technology of choice?

Following the Fukushima accident and the release of the Chinese nuclear safety plan, China will build "a few" Gen II+ projects between now and 2015, says Yun Zhou of Ux Consulting. These are projects that were either already under construction, or are paired with existing units.

After 2015, China aims to only build Gen III and Gen IV projects. "Currently, officially, the National Energy Bureau only supports AP1000 as the only Gen III model to mass-produce and CAP1400 as the only Gen III model to export. However, of course the government will not oppose other models to develop and export, if any. China is developing its own Gen III ACC1000, which could serve as a supplement for both domestic and exporting uses," she adds. (The CAP1400 has been chosen for export because the Chinese claim it has 100% Chinese intellectual property.)

Steve Kidd agrees. "AP1000s are expected to constitute the main part of the Chinese domestic programme (for now at least). The other mainstay of the Chinese programme will be the ACC1000, which is the outcome of the battle between CNNC and CGN for the Chinese Gen III-qualified 1000 MW unit."

As the ACC1000 design is derived in part from the French M310s at Daya Bay and Ling Ao Phase I, it is believed that it cannot be exported due to French intellectual property concerns. But Kidd says the ACC1000 is expected to remain very important within China, and can be built far more cheaply than the AP1000 until the latter's localisation rate is much higher.

With respect to Chinese high-temperature reactor (HTR) technology, the goal is eventually to export the HTR-PM design with independent IP rights. However, since existing Gen III reactor lifetimes could be as long as 60 years, the HTR will be at most a supplement to the domestic market in the next several decades.

China is investing in small modular reactor R&D programmes in order to be prepared for a potential international market. However, the nature of China's electricity demands and geography mean SMRs will not play a significant role in China in the near future.


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Fail-Safe Nuclear Power—b...