Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumNOAA, USGS and partners predict larger summer 'dead zone' for the Chesapeake Bay
(Please note, USGS materialscopyright concerns are nil.)
https://www.usgs.gov/news/noaa-usgs-and-partners-predict-larger-summer-dead-zone-chesapeake-bay
[font face=Serif][font size=5]NOAA, USGS and partners predict larger summer 'dead zone' for the Chesapeake Bay[/font]
Release Date: June 14, 2017
[font size=4]Low- and no-oxygen area threatens crabs, oysters, fish[/font]
[font size=3]Scientists expect this years summer Chesapeake Bay hypoxic or dead zone an area of low to no oxygen that can kill fish and aquatic life will be larger than average, approximately 1.89 cubic miles, or nearly the volume of 3.2 million Olympic-size swimming pools.
Measurements for the Bays dead zone go back to 1950, and the 30-year mean maximum dead zone volume is 1.74 cubic miles.
Despite this years forecast, weve made great strides in reducing nutrient pollution from various sources entering the Chesapeake Bay, and we are starting to see positive long-term signs, said Rob Magnien, director of NOAAs Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research. However, more work needs to be done to address non-point nutrient pollution from farms and other developed lands, to make the Bay cleaner for its communities and economic interests.
The anoxic portion of the zone, which contains no oxygen at all, is predicted to be 0.35 cubic miles in early summer, growing to 0.49 cubic miles by late summer both of which are at or slightly above average. Above average nutrient loading from the Susquehanna River this spring accounts for the overall slightly larger-than-average predicted size of the anoxic portion.
The Bays hypoxic (low oxygen) and anoxic (oxygen-free) zones are caused by excess nutrient pollution, primarily from human activities such as agriculture and wastewater. The excess nutrients stimulate an overgrowth of algae, which then sinks and decomposes in the water. The resulting low oxygen levels are insufficient to support most marine life and habitats in near-bottom waters, threatening the Bays crabs, oysters, and other fisheries.
Spring rainfall plays an important role in determining the size of the hypoxic zone. In 2017, the Susquehanna River delivered 81.4 million pounds of nitrogen into the bay, slightly greater than the long-term average. Rainfall amounts were greatest in New York and Pennsylvania, leading to higher than average streamflow into the Bay from the Susquehanna.
The Bay outlook is based on models developed by NOAA-sponsored researchers at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science and the University of Michigan. They rely on nutrient loading estimates from the U.S. Geological Survey. Throughout the year, researchers measure oxygen and nutrient levels as part of the Chesapeake Bay Monitoring Program, run by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. This years findings will be released in the fall.
The USGS supports this forecast by calculating nutrient loads based on its streamflow gauges and water-quality sampling sites, said Don Cline, associate director for the USGS Water Mission Area. The USGS and Maryland have maintained a monitoring partnership for over thirty years in order to track conditions in the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. These data are all publicly accessible at waterdata.usgs.gov."[/font][/font]
Release Date: June 14, 2017
[font size=4]Low- and no-oxygen area threatens crabs, oysters, fish[/font]
[font size=3]Scientists expect this years summer Chesapeake Bay hypoxic or dead zone an area of low to no oxygen that can kill fish and aquatic life will be larger than average, approximately 1.89 cubic miles, or nearly the volume of 3.2 million Olympic-size swimming pools.
Measurements for the Bays dead zone go back to 1950, and the 30-year mean maximum dead zone volume is 1.74 cubic miles.
Despite this years forecast, weve made great strides in reducing nutrient pollution from various sources entering the Chesapeake Bay, and we are starting to see positive long-term signs, said Rob Magnien, director of NOAAs Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research. However, more work needs to be done to address non-point nutrient pollution from farms and other developed lands, to make the Bay cleaner for its communities and economic interests.
The anoxic portion of the zone, which contains no oxygen at all, is predicted to be 0.35 cubic miles in early summer, growing to 0.49 cubic miles by late summer both of which are at or slightly above average. Above average nutrient loading from the Susquehanna River this spring accounts for the overall slightly larger-than-average predicted size of the anoxic portion.
The Bays hypoxic (low oxygen) and anoxic (oxygen-free) zones are caused by excess nutrient pollution, primarily from human activities such as agriculture and wastewater. The excess nutrients stimulate an overgrowth of algae, which then sinks and decomposes in the water. The resulting low oxygen levels are insufficient to support most marine life and habitats in near-bottom waters, threatening the Bays crabs, oysters, and other fisheries.
Spring rainfall plays an important role in determining the size of the hypoxic zone. In 2017, the Susquehanna River delivered 81.4 million pounds of nitrogen into the bay, slightly greater than the long-term average. Rainfall amounts were greatest in New York and Pennsylvania, leading to higher than average streamflow into the Bay from the Susquehanna.
The Bay outlook is based on models developed by NOAA-sponsored researchers at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science and the University of Michigan. They rely on nutrient loading estimates from the U.S. Geological Survey. Throughout the year, researchers measure oxygen and nutrient levels as part of the Chesapeake Bay Monitoring Program, run by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. This years findings will be released in the fall.
The USGS supports this forecast by calculating nutrient loads based on its streamflow gauges and water-quality sampling sites, said Don Cline, associate director for the USGS Water Mission Area. The USGS and Maryland have maintained a monitoring partnership for over thirty years in order to track conditions in the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. These data are all publicly accessible at waterdata.usgs.gov."[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1972 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NOAA, USGS and partners predict larger summer 'dead zone' for the Chesapeake Bay (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Jun 2017
OP
Freethinker65
(10,036 posts)1. Perfect time for cutting EPA funding for the Bay and the Great Lakes
Who needs water to live anyway? Waste of $$$ that can be used for tax cuts to wealthy, new funding for global non-ending conflicts, and that solar panel border wall .