Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 10:06 PM Jun 2017

Corn better used as food than biofuel, study finds

https://news.illinois.edu/blog/view/6367/520569
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Corn better used as food than biofuel, study finds[/font]

Jun 20, 2017 9:00 am | by Lois Yoksoulian

[font size=3]CHAMPAIGN, Ill. — Corn is grown not only for food, it is also an important renewable energy source. Renewable biofuels can come with hidden economic and environmental issues, and the question of whether corn is better utilized as food or as a biofuel has persisted since ethanol came into use. For the first time, researchers at the University of Illinois have quantified and compared these issues in terms of economics of the entire production system to determine if the benefits of biofuel corn outweigh the costs.



Kumar and Richardson accounted for numerous factors in their analysis, including assessing the energy required to prepare and maintain the landscape for agricultural production for corn and its conversion to biofuel. Then, they quantified the environmental benefits and impacts in terms of critical zone services, representing the effects on the atmosphere, water quality and corn’s societal value, both as food and fuel.

In monetary terms, their results show that the net social and economic worth of food corn production in the U.S. is $1,492 per hectare, versus a $10 per hectare loss for biofuel corn production.



"Using corn as a fuel source seems to be an easy path to renewable energy," said Richard Yuretich, the NSF program director for Critical Zone Observatories. "However, this research shows that the environmental costs are much greater, and the benefits fewer, than using corn for food.”

…[/font][/font]


http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000517
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Corn better used as food than biofuel, study finds (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Jun 2017 OP
It has to do with the process......... MyOwnPeace Jun 2017 #1
Conversion of starches to sugar is the start of the process. Kleveland Jun 2017 #3
Corn or Maize is delicious.... but there are some facts to be known. Kleveland Jun 2017 #2

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
1. It has to do with the process.........
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 10:21 PM
Jun 2017

(I read this years ago when we were having "trade" issues with South American countries who had sugar cane that could also be converted into "fuel&quot .

Pardon my limited knowledge of the process, but converting corn into "fuel" adds one more step to the process as opposed to sugar cane - making the process more expensive. They basically have to take the corn and do something to it to make it as usable as sugar cane already is.

However, because we wanted to be "energy independent" - we gave government subsidies to the industries to do the conversion - which left the "sugar cane" countries on the outside - a cheaper commodity that our gov't. was not allowing to compete.

Oh, this NAFTA/trade agreements/tariffs argument has SO many quirks - and I can't imagine how the current administration (I use the term "administration" VERY lightly) will have any clue as to how to figure it all out!

Kleveland

(1,257 posts)
3. Conversion of starches to sugar is the start of the process.
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 10:32 PM
Jun 2017

When corn whiskey is made, it is basically the natural process of adding enzymes to the "mash", generally with malted grains such as malted barley, which has alpha amylase and beta amylase enzymes.

When the mash is heated to a certain temperature (around 150 degrees I believe) the enzyme activate, and basically chop the long starch molecules into sugar molecules. The sugars can then be fermented. When the fermentation stops, and he sugars have been converted into alcohol and CO2, the alcohol can be distilled off of the fermented liquid in vapor form, which is then of course Ethanol when condensed.

Pretty simple process really.

Beer is basically fermented malted barley, and Scotch is basically distilled beer.

Ethanol from corn is distilled "corn beer" or "wine" if you will.

Ethanol, is obviously the fuel that we are discussing.

Many of us would rather it be moonshine or "corn squeezins'" than fuel! Same thing really.

It is all related.

Kleveland

(1,257 posts)
2. Corn or Maize is delicious.... but there are some facts to be known.
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 10:22 PM
Jun 2017

Corn as it is, if used as is as a staple food crop, can be the source of a horrible disease called pallegra.

The process called Nixtamalization radically changes the nutritional value, and minimize the dangers from mycotoxin contaminated corn.

In over simplified terms, tortillas, tamales and other such nixtalmilized corn food products are far more nutritious and healthful, as opposed to grits, corn chips or even corn bread and other corn meal or corn products.

I have lived most of my life, not knowing these simple facts.

It was during my exploration of Mexican and other South American cuisine that I learned about it all.

An excerpt from Wikipedia:

"The ancient process of nixtamalization was first developed in Mesoamerica, where maize was originally cultivated. There is no precise date when the technology was developed, but the earliest evidence of nixtamalization is found in Guatemala's southern coast, with equipment dating from 1200–1500 BC.[3]"

There are of course other sources.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Corn better used as food ...