A true failure of a business if there ever was one. Their "success" relies on careless application of chemicals in our *shared* environment, testing for the purpose of getting approval and not the truth (that eventually does come out), genetic and chemical manipulation of the world's seed resources followed by threats of lawsuits against anyone who doesn't play their game, brute force manipulation of legislation, and even violence where they can get away with it just to keep themselves in the market. They can't seem to make the company work with a model that is both environmentally responsible and humane. They fail at honest, hard work. They may have a lot of money but it's tainted with blood, disease and death.

I wouldn't go quite as far as gtar100 and call them evil, but I don't like them much. Their defense of organophosphates has been very sketchy indeed, particularly Diazanon, and their marketing is sleazy as hell.

But the claim that gyyphosphate causes cancer is very thin, and California is ignoring several studies that suggest that it does nothing of the sort; in particular one study which found no link and was ignored because it was "too large to be included in the findings." As much as I dislike Monsanto, I think it has a valid complaint on this one.

When are they putting a warning label on cans of Coors?

point of sale, and the beverage industry provides the signs.

My understanding in general is that the required warning doesn't have to be a label directly on the package, it just has to be "clear and reasonable." I would imagine that Monsanto could use the sign-posting strategy, if they don't want to change the package labeling (e.g., for non-California sales)...

https://oehha.ca.gov/proposition-65/general-info/proposition-65-plain-language