Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 04:52 AM Aug 2018

Climate change threatens crop nutrition, puts millions at risk

https://www.dw.com/en/climate-change-threatens-crop-nutrition-puts-millions-at-risk/a-45245760

Climate change threatens crop nutrition, puts millions at risk

Date 27.08.2018
Author Charli Shield

A new study estimates that hundreds of millions of people could be at risk of nutritional deficiencies because of rising levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, raising serious questions about the future of the developing world's health. The findings, published in the journal Nature Climate Change on Monday, have further revealed the extent to which climate change threatens our everyday nutrition. Researchers from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health estimate that unless carbon emissions are dramatically reduced in the coming decades, an additional 175 million people could be zinc deficient and 122 million protein deficient by 2050.

On top of this, 1.4 billion women of childbearing age and children under five could lose 4 percent of their dietary iron intake, putting them at risk of conditions like anemia.
(snip)

But there has been comparatively little research into the global health consequences of these findings. Using a GENuS (Global Expanded Nutrient Supply) database that estimates the health impact of lower nutrient intake for 151 different countries, the authors of this latest study examined which regions in the world will bear the brunt of staple crops like rice, wheat and potatoes losing their nutrients.

The biggest losers, as with most aspects of climate change, are "lower income countries," Samuel Myers, co-author of the study and director of the Planetary Health Alliance at Harvard, told DW.
(snip)

Staple crops like rice and wheat are the primary food source for more than 3 billion people around the world. Many who are unable to afford a diverse diet depend on these staple grains for most of their calories. It is these people, with "low dietary diversity" and "little animal source food" — often rich in iron zinc and protein — who will suffer the most from declining crop nutrition, Myers said.

The country expected to bear the biggest burden is India, which the researchers estimated would have an additional 50 million people deficient in zinc, 38 million protein deficient and 502 million women and children vulnerable to diseases associated with iron deficiency by midcentury.

Carbon dioxide is essential for plants to grow, but it is possible to have too much of it. While the science behind plant physiology is "complex," according to Myers, it is thought that higher concentrations of carbon dioxide can cause staple crops like wheat and rice to produce more carbohydrates, like starches and glucose, at the expense of nutrients, like protein, zinc and iron.
(snip)
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Climate change threatens crop nutrition, puts millions at risk (Original Post) nitpicker Aug 2018 OP
Recently I heard a program on NPR about carbon dioxide levels PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2018 #1
One thing about today's change: it's way faster NickB79 Aug 2018 #2
Not necessarily. PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2018 #3
"There have been times when the climate has changed very quickly. ... That killed about 95% of all progree Aug 2018 #4

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,879 posts)
1. Recently I heard a program on NPR about carbon dioxide levels
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 06:17 AM
Aug 2018

in the past, and how well animals did back then. Apparently, they did just fine at some levels well above current CO2 levels, but not so well at other high levels. And higher didn't always correlate with worse. Or better.

Which essentially means it's a crapshoot. Higher CO2 levels will be bad for some things, good for others, and neutral for yet others.

Here's the thing. Climate changes. And climate change is good, bad, or indifferent for various other species. Yes, a lot of current climate change is human caused, but when you read about climate change in the past you realize that climate change is simply climate change. Some creatures do well, others not so well.

NickB79

(19,257 posts)
2. One thing about today's change: it's way faster
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 07:34 AM
Aug 2018

We're releasing in a couple centuries as much carbon as it took Nature to release in tens of thousands of years. Life has far less time to adapt to such rapid warming.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,879 posts)
3. Not necessarily.
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 12:44 PM
Aug 2018

There have been times when the climate has changed very quickly. It's not always the slow, sluggish thing thing we were taught in school. The volcano eruptions known as the Siberian Traps were a sudden event when it started, although the eruptions lasted for millions of years. That killed about 95% of all life on the planet.

It is obvious to the most casual observer that the current rise in CO2 is mainly human caused, but sudden climate catastrophes have happened more often than people realize.

progree

(10,911 posts)
4. "There have been times when the climate has changed very quickly. ... That killed about 95% of all
Tue Aug 28, 2018, 02:24 PM
Aug 2018

life on the planet."

Yup.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Climate change threatens ...