Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum"Incrementalism Only Works When There Are Willing Partners On The Other Side; There Are None"
EDIT
What about the Republicans who pose as sensible on climate change? They arent much better. Sen. Marco Rubio criticizes the GND and instead suggests sensible policies like ... a study he once commissioned. (Seriously.) Florida Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz has sponsored a Green Real Deal resolution in Congress. The resolution acknowledges climate change as a threat to national security and says the government should promote innovation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Zack Colman reports in Politico, but it does not set any targets for future carbon cuts and calls for keeping the door open to all types of energy production.
So, no carbon cuts, no reductions in fossil fuels, but instead ... innovation. And what might that mean? Lamar Alexander offered a glimpse in One Republicans Response to Climate Change. His response? More research. (Seriously.) Incidentally: Weve seen this play before, back when Democrats were pushing the Waxman-Markey climate bill in 2009. For months and months, Democrats were led on by promises of cooperation if they just weakened the legislation a little more. It ended up so weak as to be virtually irrelevant ... and then died a sad death in the Senate, all its moderate Republican partners (including John McCain and Lindsey Graham) having abandoned it once the political pressure got turned up.
All those Republicans today, handwaving about how they might support a carbon tax? What reason is there to think that support will hold up under the inevitable pounding it takes from right-wing media? What reason is there to think any Republicans in Congress will rally to offer a Democratic administration a victory, even a small one? None. There is no evidence, no reason. Its just a feeling people have the idea of bipartisan cooperation warms a certain kind of heart. Certain politicians and pundits are drawn to the idea like a moth to a flame. It makes them feel reasonable and above mere partisanship. And that feeling is apparently immune to the lessons of experience.
EDIT
The House Democratic Caucus has recently produced a group of New Democrats who are making this pitch explicit: New Democrats position themselves as realistic alternative to Green New Deal. (The New Democrats are also offering up a bunch of policies that are perfectly commensurate with the GND framework.) But what does that mean, realistic? Why are any of the policies any of these people are offering any more likely to pass the US Congress than the bolder policies necessary to achieve GND goals? They would all get zero Republican votes. They would all ground out in the filibuster. So what does this realism consist in exactly?
GND critics are frustratingly silent on this point silent, in general, on questions of political economy, which are central to this debate. This isnt a grad school seminar, with teams competing to construct the best policy package. Nobodys getting graded. The only thing that matters is what can become law and begin to shift things on the ground. And GND critics have almost nothing to say on the subject other than the occasional handwaving at bipartisanship.
EDIT
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2019/3/28/18283514/green-new-deal-climate-policy
rampartc
(5,410 posts)if democratic leaders are afraid of democratic policies perhaps they should reexamine their va;ues.