Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumLessons Learned From an Energy Company's Green Transformation
https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2019/04/12/lessons-green-energy-transformation/Lessons Learned From an Energy Company's Green Transformation
by Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment | April 12, 2019
Ørsted, formerly Danish Oil and Natural Gas Energy, is one of few energy companies to transition primarily to renewable energy from fossil fuels. The largest power producer in Denmark, Ørsted sold its upstream oil and gas business in 2017, reduced coal use by 81 percent between 2006 and 2018, and is the planets leading offshore windfarm developer. The company also has an ambitious science-based climate target that is aligned with the Paris Climate Agreement and foresees that 99 percent of its power and heat generation will come from renewables by 2025.
Nicolas Maennling from the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment had the pleasure to talk with Jakob Askou Bøss, head of strategy and communication at Ørsted, about lessons learned from Ørsteds transition, and their implications for other energy companies hoping to succeed in a decarbonized economy.
When did Ørsted decide to become a renewable energy company? What convinced the board to approve the change?
The company decided to transform in 2008. Climate change was on the agenda, and the EU had adopted targets to build renewables. We believed that, to succeed in the long-term, the company would need to change its energy generation mix from fossil fuels to renewables. Initially, it was a vision of where the company wanted to be in the long-term and, when the vision was formulated, it did not entail shutting down specific coal-fired power plants or building new wind farms. It was a vision with a 30-year horizon, which is roughly the lifetime of our assets. This vision meant that we would start investing more in green and stop investing in black power and heat production. At the time, we thought that this transformation would take 30 years, thereby allowing our black assets to retire on schedule while installing renewables to meet new demand.
by Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment | April 12, 2019
Ørsteds Burbo Bank offshore wind farm, off the northeastern coast of the U.K. Photo: Ørsted
Ørsted, formerly Danish Oil and Natural Gas Energy, is one of few energy companies to transition primarily to renewable energy from fossil fuels. The largest power producer in Denmark, Ørsted sold its upstream oil and gas business in 2017, reduced coal use by 81 percent between 2006 and 2018, and is the planets leading offshore windfarm developer. The company also has an ambitious science-based climate target that is aligned with the Paris Climate Agreement and foresees that 99 percent of its power and heat generation will come from renewables by 2025.
Nicolas Maennling from the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment had the pleasure to talk with Jakob Askou Bøss, head of strategy and communication at Ørsted, about lessons learned from Ørsteds transition, and their implications for other energy companies hoping to succeed in a decarbonized economy.
When did Ørsted decide to become a renewable energy company? What convinced the board to approve the change?
The company decided to transform in 2008. Climate change was on the agenda, and the EU had adopted targets to build renewables. We believed that, to succeed in the long-term, the company would need to change its energy generation mix from fossil fuels to renewables. Initially, it was a vision of where the company wanted to be in the long-term and, when the vision was formulated, it did not entail shutting down specific coal-fired power plants or building new wind farms. It was a vision with a 30-year horizon, which is roughly the lifetime of our assets. This vision meant that we would start investing more in green and stop investing in black power and heat production. At the time, we thought that this transformation would take 30 years, thereby allowing our black assets to retire on schedule while installing renewables to meet new demand.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 671 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lessons Learned From an Energy Company's Green Transformation (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Apr 2019
OP
NNadir
(33,541 posts)1. Denmark is a graphic example of the bullshit lie that so called "renewable energy" is viable.
All those steel towers that will be landfill in 20 years are made using coal. Since they will need to be replaced regularly, they are hardly "renewable."
This marketing talk, reminds me of the marketing of BP, calling itself "Beyond Petroleum" just before one of their oil wells, Deepwater Horizon, blew and destroyed the entire Gulf of Mexico.
The energy flow chart for that oil and gas drilling hellhole, Denmark:
progree
(10,913 posts)2. For those interested - the link to these and other countries are at
https://flowcharts.llnl.gov/commodities/energy
I was hoping there was something later than 2011.
There is a world one (WORLD is one of the choices on the pull-down menu in the above link) at (also the latest is 2011):
h ttps://flowcharts.llnl.gov/content/assets/images/charts/Energy/ENERGY_2011_WORLD.png
^---get rid of the space after the first "h" in the above
I was hoping there was something later than 2011.
There is a world one (WORLD is one of the choices on the pull-down menu in the above link) at (also the latest is 2011):
h ttps://flowcharts.llnl.gov/content/assets/images/charts/Energy/ENERGY_2011_WORLD.png
^---get rid of the space after the first "h" in the above