Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,592 posts)
Tue May 7, 2019, 07:30 AM May 2019

Very Invisible Hand In Climate Startups; In 2018 6X As Much Went To Software As To All Clean Tech

EDIT

It is common wisdom in the tech industry that it is much easier to raise money for a software company than it is for a start-up that wants to work in biotechnology or energy. The current wave of internet-focused start-ups going public, and reaping billions of dollars for investors, has hardened the bias against so-called hard technology. Total funding for clean-tech start-ups fell during most of the past decade, according to data from the research firm Pitchbook. In 2018, $6.6 billion was invested in clean tech, about 15 percent of what went to software start-ups. Carbon-removal start-ups got a tiny sliver of that.

The lack of investment in carbon-focused start-ups poses a particularly existential problem. Two major scientific organizations said last fall that even if greenhouse-gas emissions were reduced significantly, stopping drastic global warming would require technological breakthroughs that allowed for the removal of billions of tons of carbon dioxide already in the atmosphere.

Some promising methods for accomplishing that involve old-fashioned technologies, like planting trees and changing the ways farmers till their fields. But there are dozens, if not hundreds, of start-ups developing new technologies that address the issue.

EDIT

A small number of companies have had success making this argument to investors. Carbon Engineering, a Canadian company founded in 2009 that pulls carbon dioxide out of the air by running it through specially formulated chemicals, announced last month that it had raised $68 million to build its first commercial facility. But the investment demonstrated just how difficult it has been for companies in the industry. In the time it took Carbon Engineering to raise one round of $68 million, Slack, a messaging company founded the same year, has raised more than 10 times as much and is now preparing for an initial public offering that could value it at nearly $20 billion.

EDIT

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/07/business/carbon-removal-technology-start-ups.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fclimate&action=click&contentCollection=climate&region=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=sectionfront

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Very Invisible Hand In Climate Startups; In 2018 6X As Much Went To Software As To All Clean Tech (Original Post) hatrack May 2019 OP
I'm not sure gizmos are going to get us out of this Blues Heron May 2019 #1

Blues Heron

(5,939 posts)
1. I'm not sure gizmos are going to get us out of this
Tue May 7, 2019, 07:44 AM
May 2019

People need to start doing some HARD cutbacks on their carbon generating activities. Consider one day a week - no driving - no lights - no AC, no dishwasher, no hot water etc. Cut back till it hurts babies! Gov should be encouraging "Carbon slacking"

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Very Invisible Hand In Cl...