Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumNew plan to bury tons of CO2 by changing farming practices
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/06/12/new-plan-remove-trillion-tons-carbon-dioxide-atmosphere-bury-it/?utm_term=.76b49f652031...Merely planting trees wont get the world very far. Large and slower-growing trees can sequester more carbon than smaller plants, but the world faces dramatic deforestation and has enormous agricultural needs. Farming seems like a practical focus for how to mitigate growing atmospheric carbon. Whether they can get to 1 trillion tons of carbon is unknown, Perry says, but this represents one of the largest agricultural experiments lately, with software and satellite tools available to every farmer who signs up. The goal is to find out which crops, practices and geographic locations have the ability to drive more carbon into the soil.
To start, Indigo will pay farmers $15 per ton of carbon, using venture capital raised by the company.
Some farmers have already embraced the techniques. Russell Hedrick, a regenerative grower who farms non-GMO and heirloom corn, soy, barley, oats and triticale in Hickory, N.C., has been measuring the carbon in his 1,000 acres and the best hes ever done is 1.5 tons per acre.He says the Indigo incentives could prove strong, especially at a time when farm bankruptcies are high and crop prices are sagging.
Hedrick says that in 2018, an American farmer on average lost about $60 per acre before subsidies, and made just $20 per acre after federal subsidies. So, if a farmer can put a ton and a half of carbon in each acre of soil and get paid by Indigo, they could double their profits.
more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 659 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New plan to bury tons of CO2 by changing farming practices (Original Post)
The Blue Flower
Jun 2019
OP
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)1. Feels a bit like grasping at straws
We emit 33+ billion tonnes of CO2 (~10 billion tonnes of carbon) per year at the moment.
There are 4.6 billion acres of cropland in the world. Not all acreage could absorb 1.5 tonnes, given the soil type and the crops grown.
Say each acre of cropland could be induced to store an average of 0.5 tonnes of carbon per year.
We would then be able to sequester about a third of last year's annual production. Enough to take our net emissions back to the level they were in ... 2002.
Mitigation is a mug's game.
Adaptation is the name of the only game left in town.
Start here: Deep Adaptation: A Map for Navigating Climate Tragedy (PDF)
Duppers
(28,125 posts)2. Downloaded
For later reading. Thanks!