Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Sat Aug 3, 2019, 10:56 AM Aug 2019

Environmental concerns prompt U.S. to add 8 populations to overfished list

https://www.pressherald.com/2019/08/02/environmental-concerns-add-new-species-to-u-s-overfished-list/

Changes in the environment, including warming waters, are prompting the U.S. government to add eight populations of fish to its federal overfished list, scientists with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Friday.

The annual Report to Congress on the Status of U.S. Fisheries said two populations of Chinook salmon and three populations of coho salmon will be added to the list. The agency is also adding Atlantic big eye tuna, Atlantic mackerel of the Gulf of Maine and Cape Hatteras and blue king crab of Saint Matthew Island, Alaska, to the list.

NOAA adds fish stocks to the overfished list when their populations become too low. That prompts rebuilding efforts by management councils and can result in restrictions to commercial fishing.

Environmental changes, habitat degradation and international fishing pressure contributed to the fall in the eight stocks, NOAA said in a statement. The coho salmon stocks, for example, are located in Washington state, where warmer water, drought or degraded habitat made it more difficult to spawn.

<more>
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Environmental concerns prompt U.S. to add 8 populations to overfished list (Original Post) jpak Aug 2019 OP
Geez, really? Do you think? captain queeg Aug 2019 #1

captain queeg

(10,231 posts)
1. Geez, really? Do you think?
Sat Aug 3, 2019, 11:11 AM
Aug 2019

I live in the PNW and in my job dealt with the salmon recovery effort for years. NOAA, or National Marine Fisheries, leads much of the effort. I’d been involved for years when I was stunned to learn there were two separate branches; one leading the recovery effort and one setting fishing limits. When stocks start to bounce back they increase the allowed catch. I know it’s a complex issue but it’s always seemed obvious to me that if you shut off fishing for a few years recovery would be much greater. Like I say there’s all sorts of considerations; different specie, separate runs, commercial, sport, and native fishing rights. But the amount of money they spend on some of the efforts could be diverted for a couple years to buy fishermen off and let the runs bounce back.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Environmental concerns pr...