Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

douglas9

(4,358 posts)
Thu Aug 15, 2019, 12:47 PM Aug 2019

Team Trump: 'The Only Good Forest Is A Dead Forest'

The evil genius of the people Donald Trump brought into our government so America could become a polluter’s paradise is really something to behold.

The latest Team Trump move would turn our national forests into polluter playgrounds. Companies that want to mow down old-growth trees so they can get at pockets of oil, coal or uranium are about to get pretty much everything they’ve always dreamed about. And roadless areas are marked for new roads extending miles into wilderness areas.

The way it’s being done is, in a perverse sort of way, admirably clever.

They call their plan to re-interpret how the 1970 National Environmental Policy Act applies to our national forests “streamlining” to make government more efficient. Their abuse of language is working, too. Many of the more than 29,000 people and organizations that have filed comments on the proposal embrace the Trumpian language.

They call their plan to re-interpret how the 1970 National Environmental Policy Act applies to our national forests ‘streamlining’ to make government more efficient…it’s better described as ‘steamrolling.’

Few of the comments I reviewed pushed back on “streamlining.” The proposal is better described as “steamrolling” the National Environmental Policy Act, the first federal law to require consideration of Earth and its bounty in governmental decisions.


https://www.dcreport.org/2019/08/15/trump-the-only-good-forest-is-a-dead-forest/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Team Trump: 'The Only Good Forest Is A Dead Forest' (Original Post) douglas9 Aug 2019 OP
I don't believe for one second the 29,000 people this article talks about ... are real. mr_lebowski Aug 2019 #1
What a vision!? Democrats_win Aug 2019 #2
They NEED a new mascot... Newest Reality Aug 2019 #3
Added my comment in opposition. sinkingfeeling Aug 2019 #4
Did you happen to notice... RealityChik Aug 2019 #6
HOLD ON FOLKS! A gross lie in the article about 29,000 comments in favor of trashing our forests... RealityChik Aug 2019 #5
 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
1. I don't believe for one second the 29,000 people this article talks about ... are real.
Thu Aug 15, 2019, 12:51 PM
Aug 2019

They're fucking sock-puppets.

MY DOG I HATE THESE BASTARDS!!!!!!!!!

Democrats_win

(6,539 posts)
2. What a vision!?
Thu Aug 15, 2019, 01:02 PM
Aug 2019

Do we want to live in a world without forests? Oh, and don't forget the C02-eliminating effects of forests.

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
3. They NEED a new mascot...
Thu Aug 15, 2019, 01:06 PM
Aug 2019

It is time to replace the elephant with something far more appropriate.

The Society for the Destruction of the Environment and the Death to all Life Foundation, have both endorsed this as a candidate for a new GOP mascot:

RealityChik

(382 posts)
6. Did you happen to notice...
Fri Aug 23, 2019, 09:53 PM
Aug 2019

that ALL but a few comments were in strong opposition to defiling our national forests? And here are 35,000 comments as of Wednesday. So what's with the 29,000 comments in the article? Did I misread the article? Was I somehow blind to the other 28,997 people in favor of burning down our forests? Tell me I'm delusional and I'll go back to puttering around in my garden and stay away from political comments!

RealityChik

(382 posts)
5. HOLD ON FOLKS! A gross lie in the article about 29,000 comments in favor of trashing our forests...
Fri Aug 23, 2019, 09:41 PM
Aug 2019

This article/issue is so obscure in the press, I only learned of this horrifying lie of an article a few days ago, and only by accident!! I personally went to the regulations.gov website using the link in the article to post my comment of opposition to the trashing of our forests. The comment count is up to 35,200+ now. After not seeing ANY comments in favor of trashing our forests on the first 3-4 pages, I then did sampling a random 25 or so pages and found NO COMMENT in agreement with this so-called "efficiency" update. it was truly a WTF moment of revelation. I decided to roll up my sleeves and do a deep dive. I'm retired so what the heck? It's only our national forests at risk!!!

I spent nearly half a day last Wednesday (2 days ago) randomly visiting over 200 of the 706 pages of comments and found only ONE post in favor of this change. There was one other post that was in favor ONLY if the same number of acres cleared were replanted with new trees. At 50 posts per page, in total, I reviewed over 1000 posts on about 112 randomly selected pages of the 706 pages as of 2 days ago.

I urge you all to disregard this article and go to the website to post your comments in opposition of the so-called efficiency update. There are only 35,000+ comments. What we need are 100,000. Trouble is we only have 3 days left!! Comment period ends on August 26th! Please, please help me spread the word and get people to post comments to save our forests!!!

https://www.regulations.gov/docketBrowser?rpp=50&so=DESC&sb=commentDueDate&po=0&dct=PS&D=FS-2019-0010

Thanx for listening. And, thanx in advance, for your help.

Kat Roach

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Team Trump: 'The Only Goo...