Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,953 posts)
Sat Sep 28, 2019, 09:00 PM Sep 2019

Shasta Dam: The Interior Secretary Wants to Enlarge a Dam. An Old Lobbying Client Would Benefit.

Source: New York Times

The Interior Secretary Wants to Enlarge a Dam. An Old Lobbying Client Would Benefit.

By Coral Davenport
Sept. 28, 2019
Updated 5:12 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON — For years, the Interior Department resisted proposals to raise the height of its towering Shasta Dam in Northern California. The department’s own scientists and researchers concluded that doing so would endanger rare plants and animals in the area, as well as the bald eagle, and devastate the West Coast’s salmon industry downstream.

But the project is going forward now, in a big win for a powerful consortium of California farmers that stands to profit substantially by gaining access to more irrigation water from a higher dam and has been trying to get the project approved for more than a decade.

For much of the past decade, the chief lobbyist for the group was David Bernhardt. Today, Mr. Bernhardt is the Interior Secretary.

It is not the first time that the Interior Department under Mr. Bernhardt’s leadership has taken actions that benefit his former client, the Westlands Water District, a state entity created at the behest of, and largely controlled by, some of California’s wealthiest farmers. Mr. Bernhardt also promoted the weakening of an endangered-species regulation that would get Westlands more water, a move that has put him under scrutiny from his department’s inspector general.

The Shasta is already one of the tallest dams in the nation, and preliminary work has begun to raise its height by 18.5 feet. That would allow it to hold about 14 percent more water, and the 1,000 or so Central Valley farmers that Westlands represents would receive more than anyone else.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/28/climate/bernhardt-shasta-dam.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shasta Dam: The Interior Secretary Wants to Enlarge a Dam. An Old Lobbying Client Would Benefit. (Original Post) Eugene Sep 2019 OP
This is an odd ball project captain queeg Sep 2019 #1

captain queeg

(10,247 posts)
1. This is an odd ball project
Sat Sep 28, 2019, 09:30 PM
Sep 2019

As soon as I saw it I figured it was somehow benefiting a relatively small group of farmers. I really haven’t looked closely but there would be so much resistance by a wide variety of groups it would seem to have to be some wealthy farmers. The BOR’s mission supports irrigation but this would have to be some Trump supporter’s idea. I can’t imagine this ever getting off the ground in past years. Trump has stacked all administrator’s positions with anti environmental people.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Shasta Dam: The Interior ...