Greenwashing: Multiple Lessons From The Recent Past, Given Just How Much Corporations Care Of Late
EDIT
In 2000, FedEx teamed with the Environmental Defense Fund to develop a revolutionary hybrid truck design to bring down greenhouse gas emissions by 30% while reducing air pollution. FedEx planned to start replacing its dirtier-burning diesel trucks in 2003 with the potential of rolling out 30,000 new vehicles in a decade. I cant envision any reason why we wouldnt roll this out over the whole fleet, one executive said. By making this commitment, they are taking a giant step forward for the environment in the United States, Geroge W. Bushs EPA administrator, Christine Todd Whitman, told the New York Times.
The revolution never took hold. By 2010, FedEx had added only a few hundred electric and hybrid vehicles, citing the daunting costs of purchasing or converting vehicles. Today, the company has fewer than 4,000 alternative energy vehicles on the roadabout 2% of its ground fleet of 180,000+ vehicles worldwide, lagging behind UPS (with more than 10,000 alternative fuel vehicles in its total fleet of 123,000). After balking at the cost of a new green fleet, FedEx (like much of the ground shipping industry) has refocused its sustainability work on relatively low-hanging fruit such as making improvements to its existing fleets fuel efficiency (which can save money without major new investments). FedEx has made strides, improving fuel efficiency 39.6% from a 2005 baseline, and claims to still be revolutioniz[ing] the industry. But none of this moves to transition corporate ground fleets to renewable fuel.
EDIT
Aviation makes up roughly 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions, one of the fastest-growing sources. Since the mid-2000s, some airlines have offered passengers a chance to assuage their own carbon guilt by purchasing carbon offsets: For an extra fee, flyers buy into forest management and other environmentally friendly projects to balance out the carbon theyre using. Virgin Atlantic Airways helped lead the chargeon the public relations front, at least.
Promising its carbon offsets are tested against strict criteria about what counts as a carbon reduction, Virgin assures customers that carbon credits support environmental conservation and improve peoples lives by delivering household savings, health benefits and improving water resources. But at least one offset project advertised by Virgin has proved to be a sham. The environmental and social justice organization Fern issued a failing grade, in 2017, to Virgins offset credits for forest conservation in Oddar Meanchey, Cambodia. An investigation found that nearly half of the forest that was supposed to be protected had been clear-cut. Ferns Julia Christian told the Phnom Penh Post those carbon credits are bogusthey are based on emissions savings that never happened, because the forest was destroyed, not protected.
EDIT
https://inthesetimes.com/article/21995/6-corporate-climate-schemes-bp-cargill-fedex-virgin-adm-bunge-fiji