Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumPoliticians Knew 100 Years Ago That The Colorado River Was Being Overallocated - They Didn't Care
EDIT
As conventional wisdom has it, the states were relying on bad data when they divided up the water. But a new book challenges that narrative. Turn-of-the-century hydrologists actually had a pretty good idea of how much water the river could spare, water experts John Fleck and Eric Kuhn write in Science be Dammed: How Ignoring Inconvenient Science Drained the Colorado River. They make the case that politicians and water managers in the early 1900s ignored evidence about the limits of the rivers resources.
In 1916, six years before the Colorado River Compact was signed, Eugene Clyde LaRue, a young hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, concluded that the Colorado Rivers supplies were not sufficient to irrigate all the irrigable lands lying within the basin. Other hydrologists at the agency and researchers studying the issue came to the same conclusion. Alas, their warnings were not heeded. I caught up with Fleck and Kuhn to learn why LaRue and others were ignored and what history can teach us about the decisions being made on the river today. This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.
Q. When did you both realize that the conventional wisdom about the framers of Colorado River law using bad data was incorrect? Was there an aha moment?
A. Fleck: The aha moment for me was when I found the transcripts of LaRues 1925 congressional testimony, when he said, as clear as could be, that theres not enough water for this thing they were trying to do. It erased any doubt I had that the reports were too technical and people didnt really understand them. He was there testifying before Congress, and they just chose to ignore it. None of the senators followed up. They were clearly choosing to willfully ignore what LaRue was saying.
Kuhn: He wasnt alone. There was USGS hydrologist Herman Stabler, an engineering professor from the University of Arizona, and a very high-level commission appointed by Congress, headed by a famous Army Corps of Engineers lieutenant general, and they came to the same conclusion. The surprise to me was how widespread the information was among the experts at the time. There was never even enough water in the system for what we wanted to do before climate change became an issue.
EDIT
https://grist.org/climate/politicians-knew-the-inconvenient-truth-about-the-colorado-river-100-years-ago-and-ignored-it/
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Politicians think in terms of 2 year and 4 year plans.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Throck
(2,520 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)and why humans generally are not "planners" for future issues
Throck
(2,520 posts)Underwear, socks.............. Lincoln Logs, Erector Set! Toys without batteries if we got them. Pre-Lego days!
When we were older my brothers and I got Craftsmen tools. I think my dad was setting us up to work on the house.
Somehow the world took a turn into rampant consumerism.
mountain grammy
(26,622 posts)Making false promises with no worries about future impacts because well be gone. How very human, and especially American.