Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumSneering, Condescending And (Above All) Ineffectual - The GOP's Climate "Shift" In A Nutshell
Astounding that as the evidence of climate change literally washes up around their ankles, Republicans are looking for ways to pretend theyve been right all along, and slander as alarmists those who have been communicating the unvarnished science of global change for decades.
Now there is a movement to push forward conservative solutions, meaning, no solution.
Houston Chronicle:
Texas Rep. Dan Crenshaw said Wednesday that conservatives cant afford to ignore the topic of climate change. We can make fun of the lefts sort of alarmist views on climate change and we should, to an extent but we cant ignore it completely, Crenshaw said during a keynote Q-and-A at the right-leaning Texas Public Policy Foundations 2020 policy conference. From a political standpoint, we cannot ignore it completely.
The 35-year-old congressman, who has proven to be a leader within the party for rallying young conservatives, said most of the lefts alarmism on climate change is unwarranted, but not all of it. Its not totally untrue. Their alarmism is often, almost always, completely untrue and not founded in facts or data. When theyre blaming storms and things on climate change, its usually nonsense, Crenshaw said. That doesnt mean there isnt some effect on the climate from man-made emissions, and we can admit that.
EDIT
He made the remarks while explaining why he supports Republicans climate plan, led by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and still being drafted, one that could eventually rival the Green New Deal legislation supported by some Democrats, including presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. McCarthy told Axios this week that the plan will focus on capturing carbon dioxide emissions, clean-energy innovation and funding, and conservation. (In true millennial fashion, Crenshaw said hes pushing McCarthy to come up with a catchy hashtag for it.)
The American people should know: theres a 3rd option when it comes to addressing climate change, Crenshaw tweeted Tuesday after McCarthys draft made news. Its not the absurd Green New Deal, & its not inaction. Its innovation & itll decrease emissions without sacrificing our economy. Example: carbon capture, LNG, hydro & nuclear.
EDIT
https://climatecrocks.com/2020/01/26/not-totally-untrue-republicans-edge-away-from-denial-with-no-sense-of-shame/#more-58793
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 526 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sneering, Condescending And (Above All) Ineffectual - The GOP's Climate "Shift" In A Nutshell (Original Post)
hatrack
Jan 2020
OP
zaj
(3,433 posts)1. "from a political standpoint"
Jesus, even when they take a turn for the good, you can see clearly how literally everything they do and say is no deeper than...
"How do we turn this into empty propaganda so we can seize power?"
walker59
(36 posts)2. Acknowledging it would hurt corporate profits
By extension, it would hurt their campaign donations. No further reasoning is necessary.