Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumColorado Sen. Kerry Donovan wants to slow the roll on wolf reintroduction.
https://coloradosun.com/2020/01/24/colorado-bill-slow-wolf-reintroduction-donovan/Jan 24, 2020
The Vail Democrat, who represents seven Western Slope counties, has crafted legislation she hopes to submit on Friday that allows Colorado Parks and Wildlife to manage wolves, but would postpone any reintroduction efforts until money is found to reimburse ranchers who lose livestock to wolves. The bill would cancel reintroduction outright if wildlife officials determine that the state already has a self-sustaining population of gray wolves.
The bill is a detour around a question on Novembers ballot that asks voters to direct Colorado Parks and Wildlife to reintroduce about 10 wolves a year into Western Slope wildlands starting in 2023. Donovans legislation delays possible reintroduction until the last day of 2025, after state agriculture and wildlife officials work together to measure potential damage caused by wolves and determine how to pay for lost livestock.
Passage of legislation and a ballot measure could set up a conflict. Legislation does not automatically override voter-approved initiatives.
I think we can say history has shown that when a compromise is reached inside the (Capitol) building that often results in initiatives being pulled off the ballot, Donovan said.
Organizers behind the ballot initiative applauded Donovans effort to balance wolf reintroduction with the needs of Colorados ranchers, but they will not support the bill. Rob Edwards with the Rocky Mountain Wolf Action Fund said they are happy to discuss compensation plans and proactive measures ranchers can take to prevent predation of livestock.
What is not acceptable is delaying reintroduction until everything is worked out, Edwards said. We already have this scoped out to the end of 2023. There is plenty of time for everybody to figure out how to do this. We dont need a delay beyond that.
-----------------------------
Senator Kerry Donovan
Occupation Rancher
Party Democrat
Leadership Position Majority Whip
Committee Assignments Agriculture & Natural Resources
Chair Transportation & Energy
Vice Chair Legislative Council
District 5, Counties Chaffee, Delta, Eagle, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Lake, Pitkin
The Western Slope has about 70% of the state's water. The Colorado River and its tributaries divide the region into north and south at Grand Junction, Colorado. The Western Slope region is sparsely populated, containing 38% of Colorado's area but only 10.7% of its population.
MontanaMama
(23,334 posts)They absolutely have a right to be here. I fully supported re-introduction here in Montana. However, I believe that wolves have sustained terrible cruelty and death that they might not have otherwise been subjected to had they not been re-introduced in certain areas. Wolves will go where ever they can and where ever they can be left alone. Humans, even wolf biologists, sometimes dont know whats best for wolves. I have always found it shocking and disturbing how wolves are hated by so many people in the west. I for one, am comforted knowing that wolves, mountain lions and other predators still room free.
Beringia
(4,316 posts)I hope that over time, their supporters bring about a change in attitude by even the people who don't like them.
They are different than bears or cougars, because they live in families and probably are easier to find and kill for that reason.
A wolf in California was found dead recently. People can take pot shots at them anonymously.
MontanaMama
(23,334 posts)bumper stickers showing crosshairs on a howling wolf up here...or the worst one that shows crosshairs on a wolf that says smoke a pack a day. It makes me ill.
2naSalit
(86,743 posts)a lobbyist for wolves in the tri-state DPS (MT, ID, WY) reintroduction back in the 90s. My badge of honor is the hatred I received from a former SofInt, several governors and senators and a bunch of hot heads in the region. I got out of it because I desired my safety, it's why I moved to MT, to get to a more sane state.
It was a topic I loved for the ranger talks I gave when I was in the park. I would give presentations still if anyone asked. I still have my Ppt slideshows and notes and it's easy enough to find updated info.
Oh and while we're on the subject...FYI from one of my wildlife warrior buddies:
http://www.thewildlifenews.com/2020/02/07/wolf-opposition-is-part-of-the-cultural-war/
MontanaMama
(23,334 posts)Cant argue with the science. The dollars paid out to ranchers for their losses are outrageous. I had no idea.
2naSalit
(86,743 posts)and you live in the region. Sadly the press isn't helpful most of the time either.
And the states are always cooking the books when it comes to population counts, especially ID and WY. It's one of the things I argued against; taking the wolves off the ESA protections and allowing the states to manage them because this was and has always been the problem. It's not a biological argument, so the opposition uses the tactics we are seeing on the national scale now, emotion with no backup data. It has been ever thus.
I really would like to make a video of my park presentation, it wold be very helpful if it got on youtoob or something. When I gave the evening programs on the topic, the amphitheater was nearly always full. And when it was over, I would get a lot of people lining up to talk and thank me for the truth. You can't just make a biased presentation when you work for the NPS, you get to write your talks but they have to be approved and then are audited by officials who attend your talks. If you aren't meeting the standard, you'll hear about it. I had the advantage of having been involved long before the NPS gig, the whole issue was a case study in college.
Glad you liked George's article. He's a prolific writer and an environmental champion.
Phoenix61
(17,009 posts)say who owns the land. Is this federal land they are grazing on? If we need to pay them for lost animals how about we start charging them market value for grazing rights.
MontanaMama
(23,334 posts)before I even read your post. In my humble opinion, if a cow is killed by a wolf on public land, I dont think we should have to pay fuck all in damages for that animal. Ranchers pay pennies for grazing rights on public land.