Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Mon Mar 2, 2020, 10:07 AM Mar 2020

Of COURSE The "Trillion Tree Bill" Will Promote More Logging; GOP Ranking Member Blows It Off

EDIT

A recent package of legislation proposed by House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy would encourage capturing climate pollutants from power plants but use them to drill for oil. It would also lead to the planting of a trillion trees to absorb carbon emissions but also ramp up logging, an idea Donald Trump has endorsed. “It’s greenwashing,” said Randi Spivak, public lands director at the Center for Biological Diversity, which organized a letter of opposition on the tree bill from dozens of environment groups to the House natural resources committee. “The science is very clear,” Spivak said. “We need to slash our carbon pollution by 50% over the next 10 years if we want to avert the worst impacts of global warming and keep global warming to a 1.5C increase.”

EDIT

“I give [House Republicans] a great deal of credit for acknowledging the problem and stepping forward with proposals and recognizing that the politics of this has changed,” he said. “But also acknowledging that they are in the early stages of really substantive climate proposals.” Bruce Westerman, an Arkansas Republican who introduced the trees bill, insisted his proposal would curb emissions even as it promotes logging. When trees are cut down, they stop absorbing carbon. Westerman, a forester who worked for an engineering consulting firm in the timber, pulp and paper business, said forest managers would just plant them again. Products made from the trees would pay for continual planting, he said, and the wood would be used for sustainable buildings with lower emissions footprints.

A scientist called to testify by Democrats, Yale ecology professor Carla Staver, strongly disagreed with Westerman’s proposals. Forest management is an important way to fight climate change but it is not enough and it must be done properly, experts agree. A bill from Democrats would aim to conserve forests without increasing logging and by banning oil and gas drilling on public lands if climate emissions exceed targets.

Westerman told the Guardian Democrats should be working with Republicans who want to address climate change. “Even someone who’s not a forester should be able to recognize an olive branch when they see one,” he said. Even as Westerman defended his bill, the top Republican on his committee seemed to dismiss the overall effort. At the beginning of the meeting, to which he was late, Rob Bishop of Utah suggested the elevators in House office buildings would be more timely under the rule of Benito Mussolini than they are with Democrats in charge. Democratic climate proposals, he said, offered not a “silver bullet” to fix the problem but “another bullet that is going to be used to shoot ourselves in the foot”.

EDIT

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/02/greenwashing-house-republicans-climate-legislation

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Of COURSE The "Trillion Tree Bill" Will Promote More Logging; GOP Ranking Member Blows It Off (Original Post) hatrack Mar 2020 OP
Our climate catastrophe jeffreyi Mar 2020 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Of COURSE The "Trillion T...