Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 07:53 AM Sep 2020

Because OF COURSE: Shitstain Plan Eliminates Environmental Review For Drilling In National Forests

The Trump administration is proposing to make it easier for oil and gas companies to drill on US forest service lands. A proposed rule would eliminate key environmental reviews and public notice requirements, according to environmental advocates.

Currently, 2.7 % of the acreage of the national forest system has been leased by energy industries. An analysis by The Wilderness Society finds that the changes would make drilling more likely on more than 9m acres of land with high, medium or moderate development potential in Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. Many of the forests are near tribal lands or include the traditional territories of indigenous peoples, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

Western US forests could see the biggest changes, but the rule could also affect the east coast, where there is far less forest service land.

Drilling within forests would require clearing trees for well pads and disrupting the ecosystem for roads and pipelines.

EDIT

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/sep/01/trump-administration-rule-drilling-national-forests

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Because OF COURSE: Shitstain Plan Eliminates Environmental Review For Drilling In National Forests (Original Post) hatrack Sep 2020 OP
The fix is in. Of course he sides w/Exxon et al. CurtEastPoint Sep 2020 #1
Why bother making law in Congress when a future President can invalidate it? no_hypocrisy Sep 2020 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author CatLady78 Sep 2020 #3

no_hypocrisy

(46,130 posts)
2. Why bother making law in Congress when a future President can invalidate it?
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 07:56 AM
Sep 2020

Shouldn't a law become passe and useless when the USSC invalidates it?

I had a hard time accepting the presidential Signing Statement, like when Shrub wrote which parts of a law he'd have difficulty enforcing. Now Trump is canceling the Environmental Protection Act, one provision at a time.

Response to hatrack (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Because OF COURSE: Shits...