Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumHouse Interior Department appropriations bill takes an axe to conservation programs
Washington, D.C. Crucial programs that protect wildlife and habitat were slashed today in a bill approved by the House Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations subcommittee. While the bills overall funding is reduced by 4 percent, certain programs were singled out for the worst cuts in the bill. The subcommittee bill cuts the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by more than 20 percent and the land acquisition program under the Land and Water Conservation Fund by 80 percent below the FY 2012 enacted levels. The cut to the Fish and Wildlife Service budget includes a 30 percent reduction in the program that protects new plants and animals under the Endangered Species Act, severely restricting efforts to protect more than 250 candidate species, many of which have awaited listing protection for years. The bill also contains numerous extreme anti-conservation policy riders long sought by industry and extreme conservatives alike, including language that would force a decision on the delisting of the gray wolf in Wyoming, a state that is already planning extensive wolf killing programs once the species is delisted.
Below is a statement from Jamie Rappaport Clark, President of the Defenders of Wildlife.
Paying to conserve something now is much cheaper than paying to restore it later. This is the simple equation that many members of Congress just dont seem to understand. The funding cuts passed today will inflict serious damage in many critical areas of our natural heritage, including the air we breathe, the water we drink and our nations wildlife. Reversing that damage will be a lengthy and costly process.
In a replay of last year, the House bill singles out the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, our nations premier wildlife conservation agency, for some of the most punishing cuts, far beyond what may be needed in the name of deficit reduction. These cuts not only harm our precious wildlife refuges, endangered plants and animals, and migratory birds, but given that wildlife associated recreation is a $122 billion a year industry, they will harm also our nations economy, especially local communities that benefit most from wildlife-based ecotourism dollars.
http://www.grandcanyontrust.org/news/2012/06/house-interior-department-appropriations-bill-takes-an-axe-to-conservation-programs/
----------------------------------------
Crucial Bird Conservation Programs Cut by 50 Percent by House
(Washington, D.C., June 22, 2012) In a move attacked by bird conservation groups as one of the most regressive wildlife appropriations ever, crucial conservation programs were slashed by 50% of FY 2012 funding levels in a funding bill approved by the House Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee for Fiscal Year 2013. The Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act (NMBCA) - a major source of funding for conservation programs that benefit migratory birds was also cut in half.
Also sliced in half were funding for State Wildlife Grants, the nations core program for preventing birds and wildlife from becoming endangered in addition to supporting strategic conservation investments in every state and territory, and the North American Wetlands Conservation Act, which provides funding for conservation projects that benefit wetland birds.
I think this is a serious setback on the threat-to-wildlife scale, said Darin Schroeder, Vice President for Conservation Advocacy for American Bird Conservancy, the nations leading bird conservation organization. Of course we are in tough economic times, but the answer certainly isnt to slash and burn conservation programs! Wildlife related activities such as birdwatching pump billions of dollars into the economy every year. If wildlife conservation programs are gutted and wildlife populations shrink, local economies will suffer. Theres no doubt that funding for these wildlife bills are both effective and essential.
For example, NMBCA is the only federal U.S. grants program specifically dedicated to the conservation of migrant birds throughout the Americas. NMBCA has a proven track record of success, having supported 367 projects in 48 U.S. states and territories and 35 other countries since its inception in 2002. NMBCA grants totaling more than $39 million have leveraged $152 million in matching funds, a partner to grant dollar match of nearly 4:1. To date, more than 3 million acres of migratory bird habitat have been positively affected. Advances in conservation for many declining species, such as the Baltimore Oriole, Scarlet Tanager and Cerulean Warbler, owe much to the NMBCA.
http://www.abcbirds.org/newsandreports/releases/120622.html
pinto
(106,886 posts)A sound environmental and fiscal statement.
tabatha
(18,795 posts)Does this go to congress? Can it be vetoed?
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Fact Sheet Responding to Republican No Budget Claims
http://democrats.senate.gov/2012/01/24/fact-sheet-responding-to-republican-no-budget-claims/
GOP Senators Agree: Senate Passed Budget Agreement In August (2011)
... <SNIP> ... The Budget Control Act, passed by the Senate in August, set the federal budget for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 a fact acknowledged in recent months by leading Senate Republicans: ... <SNIP>
http://democrats.senate.gov/2012/01/24/gop-senators-agree-senate-passed-%E2%80%98budget-agreement%E2%80%99-in-august/
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)This sort of thing could pass the Senate, imo.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)It may or may not pass the senate, I'm not sure of how important this budget is to pass before the new congresspeople are sworn in. Get out the vote is all I can say. Congress is rabidly right wing.
FogerRox
(13,211 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)one of his big focus was the hunters and fisherman and what the republicans want to do with the environmental laws. if the streams and fields are poisoned then there`s nothing to fish or hunt for. every program they want to cut directly effects hunting , fishing,and i forgot lake and river front homes that people enjoy.
this is a huge win win for the democrats if they take advantage of it.