Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumWorkers at San Onofre Nuclear Plant Report Culture of Fear, Deep Mistrust
http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20121003/san-onofre-nuclear-power-plant-california-edison-whistleblower-leaked-document-restructuring-fukushima-safety
Workers at San Onofre Nuclear Plant Report Culture of Fear, Deep Mistrust
Edison, the utility that runs San Onofre, is in upheaval as it digests new evidence that many of its employees are working in an environment of fear.
By Elizabeth Douglass, InsideClimate News
Oct 4, 2012
Story updated at 3 p.m. EDT, Oct. 4, 2012
The utility that runs California's troubled San Onofre nuclear plant is in the midst of unprecedented upheaval as it works to rein in bloated management, address ethics issues and digest new evidence that many of its employees work in a "pressure-cooker" environment marked by overwork, distrust and fear of retaliation, according to documents obtained by InsideClimate News.
The internal documentsone report, one companywide survey and a series of management e-mailsreveal that in the last few months, electric utility Southern California Edison has quietly begun a restructuring that has thus far included the ouster or retirement of several top executives, the consolidation of ethics investigations within SCE's corporate parent and the reorganization of several departments.
<snip>
According to the company's most recent employee ethics and compliance survey, summarized in a June 2012 presentation obtained by InsideClimate News, only 39 percent of the utility's workers agreed that Edison rewards people who follow its ethics and compliance standards. Only 54 percent said they could question management decisions without fear of retaliation. And 38 percent said Edison does not reward questionable actions, compared to 61 percent in a 2007 national survey that asked a similar question.
Karlene Roberts, an expert in workplace culture within high-risk industries and a professor at University of California Berkeley's Haas business school, said this about those survey results: "Those numbers are bad ... that company's in trouble."
<snip>
Workers at San Onofre Nuclear Plant Report Culture of Fear, Deep Mistrust
Edison, the utility that runs San Onofre, is in upheaval as it digests new evidence that many of its employees are working in an environment of fear.
By Elizabeth Douglass, InsideClimate News
Oct 4, 2012
Story updated at 3 p.m. EDT, Oct. 4, 2012
The utility that runs California's troubled San Onofre nuclear plant is in the midst of unprecedented upheaval as it works to rein in bloated management, address ethics issues and digest new evidence that many of its employees work in a "pressure-cooker" environment marked by overwork, distrust and fear of retaliation, according to documents obtained by InsideClimate News.
The internal documentsone report, one companywide survey and a series of management e-mailsreveal that in the last few months, electric utility Southern California Edison has quietly begun a restructuring that has thus far included the ouster or retirement of several top executives, the consolidation of ethics investigations within SCE's corporate parent and the reorganization of several departments.
<snip>
According to the company's most recent employee ethics and compliance survey, summarized in a June 2012 presentation obtained by InsideClimate News, only 39 percent of the utility's workers agreed that Edison rewards people who follow its ethics and compliance standards. Only 54 percent said they could question management decisions without fear of retaliation. And 38 percent said Edison does not reward questionable actions, compared to 61 percent in a 2007 national survey that asked a similar question.
Karlene Roberts, an expert in workplace culture within high-risk industries and a professor at University of California Berkeley's Haas business school, said this about those survey results: "Those numbers are bad ... that company's in trouble."
<snip>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 805 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Workers at San Onofre Nuclear Plant Report Culture of Fear, Deep Mistrust (Original Post)
bananas
Oct 2012
OP
That Sort of Corporate Culture Should Not Be Allowed Anywhere Near a Nuclear Power Plant
AndyTiedye
Oct 2012
#1
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)1. That Sort of Corporate Culture Should Not Be Allowed Anywhere Near a Nuclear Power Plant
NNadir
(33,542 posts)2. Which is unlike the culture of cheerful happy people killing at the plants run by Amory Lovins'...
...gas bag friends.
Anti-nuke stupidity. ignorance and fear has lead to the burning of huge amounts of fossil fuels in Japan and Germany this year. There are no fossil fuel plants anywhere on the face of the earth that operate normally without killing people, 3.3 million per year, every year
Of course, the anti-nukes couldn't care less about who their oil, gas and coal pals kill, because, um,. well, it pays....
Famous Anti-nuke Amory Lovins describes his revenue sources.
Mr. Lovinss other clients have included Accenture, Allstate, AMD, Anglo American, Anheuser-Busch, Bank of America, Baxter, Borg-Warner, BP, HP Bulmer, Carrier, Chevron, Ciba-Geigy, CLSA, ConocoPhillips, Corning, Dow, Equitable, GM, HP, Invensys, Lockheed Martin, Mitsubishi, Monsanto, Motorola, Norsk Hydro, Petrobras, Prudential, Rio Tinto, Royal Dutch/Shell, Shearson Lehman Amex, STMicroelectronics, Sun Oil, Suncor, Texas Instruments, UBS, Unilever, Westinghouse, Xerox, major developers, and over 100 energy utilities. His public-sector clients have included the OECD, the UN, and RFF; the Australian, Canadian, Dutch, German, and Italian governments; 13 states; Congress, and the U.S. Energy and Defense Departments.
But what have we here?
A claim from an anti-nuke who lives in a culture of fear, ignorance, superstition and paranoia that San Onofre workers are, um,. unhappy?
Really?
As unhappy as someone working at say, Lovins employer BP? Conoco Phillips? Those wonderful people at Suncor who run those wonderful oil sands operations in Alberta?
For the thirty years that San Ononfre has operated, scientifically illiterate paranoid nincompoops have been saying horrible things about it.
Not one, zero of them can identify ONE fucking person who was injured by the plant, not one, and certainly not as many people as will die in Southern California in the next two hours from air pollution.
Right fucking now, the planetary atmosphere is collapsing. It didn't have to happen, but it is now unstoppable. The WHO figures for climate related deaths are now being published. People were dying in large numbers ten years ago.
DALY, climate change, WHO data, 2004
And what do our anti-nukes have to say about that?
Oh, I see, they heard from a friend of a friend of a friend in the vast circle jerk of self referential anti-nuke cultists, that the bathrooms at San Onofre aren't clean enough, and could carry Samonella.
This August we were more than 2 ppm higher than last August in dangerous fossil fuel waste in the atmosphere. Grain crops have been failing all over the planet. Heckuva job anti-nuke Congratulations. You have the world you've whined for. You must be very, very, very, very, very proud. Congrats again.