Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 02:01 PM Oct 2012

Going Bankrupt on Planet Earth: The Debate Subject for the Ages by Tom Engelhardt

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/10/13-4



As expected, the deficit and debt were both discussed in the first presidential debate on domestic policy. However, despite this year’s endless American summer and a devastating drought that won’t leave town, climate change wasn’t. What would you bet that it won’t be a significant topic in the final debate on foreign policy either? Only one conclusion seems reasonable: climate change has no place on this American planet.

So far, both presidential campaigns indicate as much. To a wave of laughter in the final moments of his acceptance speech at the Republican convention, Mitt Romney mocked the subject, linking it negatively to the president. (“President Obama promised to begin to slow the rise of the oceans and heal the planet. My promise... is to help you and your family.”) Obama simply avoided the subject in his. And that pretty much sums up the situation to date.

Though opinion polls indicate that undecided voters want to hear the candidates’ thoughts on climate change, I’m hardly the first person to note that the subject has gone MIA in the campaign season. Noam Chomsky, the Nation magazine, Salon’s Andrew Leonard, and Joe Romm of Climate Progress, among others, have all commented strikingly on its disappearance. But here’s the curious thing: if American debt and deficit happen to be your worry, then climate change should be your subject.

In response to a question about the deficit in the first debate, Romney typically said, “I think it's, frankly, not moral for my generation to keep spending massively more than we take in, knowing those burdens are going to be passed on to the next generation and they're going to be paying the interest and the principal all their lives.” Not a bad point really. Who wants to pile an unbearable burden of debt on future generations who won’t be able to work their way out from under it?
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Going Bankrupt on Planet Earth: The Debate Subject for the Ages by Tom Engelhardt (Original Post) xchrom Oct 2012 OP
It's economy versus enrivonment since economy depends upon resources. Gregorian Oct 2012 #1
Its pretty obvious there will be no political solution, ... CRH Oct 2012 #2
It helps if you can see the humor pscot Oct 2012 #3
The environmental situation does not inspire humor, ... CRH Oct 2012 #4
I think it's people are having a big party as they know it's ending. Gregorian Oct 2012 #5
I enjoyed your post, ... CRH Oct 2012 #6

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
1. It's economy versus enrivonment since economy depends upon resources.
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 02:08 PM
Oct 2012

So it won't be discussed in any meaningful way. I made this point in a thread on debate topics a few days ago.

I'm afraid it's all over. I just watched the first stage of the Tour of Beijing bike race, and out of disgust for what I saw in the surrounding city, I simply turned it off. Massive new architectural wonders.

And while looking for a new place to call home, in the surrounding Portland area, brand new mansions that are monuments to materialism make me feel ill and full of disgust.

In only a few years we went from fields to concrete. Forests to tree farms. And it's not going to stop. It's increasing with every new baby born.

edit- Shit, I wasn't going to post my environmental thoughts on DU any more. Oops, I blew it.

CRH

(1,553 posts)
2. Its pretty obvious there will be no political solution, ...
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 09:01 AM
Oct 2012

if the summer sea ice melt made no impression ...
if the drought in the US and consequent crop failures made no impression, ...
if the drought then soggy cloud cover over England and northern Europe ...
if none of this deserves even a whimper from the supposed environmental party during an election year, well it is obvious maintaining human consumption is a more politically expedient perception than maintaining a habitable environment for future generations.

At this point I no longer mourn the human plight on this planet, I rather, laugh at the perception that humans are thought to be the highest form of intelligence.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
3. It helps if you can see the humor
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 11:35 AM
Oct 2012

But that gets harder to do as the shape of the future emerges.

CRH

(1,553 posts)
4. The environmental situation does not inspire humor, ...
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 12:48 PM
Oct 2012

but humans perception of humans as an elevated specie by means of intelligence, is black humor that can't be denied. The tragedy is so many people see what is happening today in human terms with human blinders. Like this life and planet is all about them. Being a small part of a whole, is an alien concept, right up until their human ingenuity and intelligence snuffs their own candle.

But I agree, watching it all happen on a daily basis is a head shaking affair. The only thing that makes it easier for me is realizing, that for the planet it is only cause and effect relationships, changing to a different state. The earth will survive just fine, it just won't be a pleasant playground for many of the species that exist today. Any emotions that evolves from this evolution, well, they are simply human.

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
5. I think it's people are having a big party as they know it's ending.
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 01:28 PM
Oct 2012

I've been working with a brilliant man on what may very well be the next generation of energy conversion devices. This is a fuel cell technology. He and I have been getting patents ready as we build up a group of scientists and engineers to get this thing going. Our conversations are wild in that we discuss everything from whether there's a god, to whether reversing global warming is going to even make a difference. We have heated arguments.

At this point in time I feel that the rate of change in a big variety of things combined with the severity of the problems indicates that we're too late. And then we argue very heatedly regarding trying versus just rolling over. And we also argue about whether changing technologies will result in a more biological form of human technology that will reverse and even allow us to survive.

And then there's the notion of people jettisoning off to other planets, which I think is absurd considering how bleak these other planets are. No birds, fish, wind, trees, butterflies.

I think earth is it, and we're very close to changing it to a point where the quality of life is poor. That's about all. It is maddening that so many people are seemingly blind to this quality idea. I like peace and beauty. It's as if most people don't even know what that is.

Believe it or not, it may sound odd, but I'm beginning to think that mistreatment of young children is the biggest problem we face. There would be no Mitt Romneys and George Bush's and Hitlers if we changed the way we raise children.

CRH

(1,553 posts)
6. I enjoyed your post, ...
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 01:39 PM
Oct 2012

good luck with your cutting edge fuel cell technology, and always make the time for the diversity of thought, through discussions in you two person chowder society. Pure brain food.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Going Bankrupt on Planet ...