Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 11:43 AM Nov 2012

Woody Harrelson pushes tree-free paper


from NOW Toronto:


Woody Harrelson pushes tree-free paper
Eco-actor now marketing 80% ag waste paper aims for 100.

By Ellie Kirzner


Add a new enthusiasm to effervescent Woody Harrelson’s long list of planetary passions.

Now the actor, biodiesal promoter and raw food afficinado is aiming to make no-tree paper, made of 100 percent agricultural waste.

At the end of October, Canadian-based Prairie Pulp and Paper, a company Harrelson has an interest in, got the seal of approval from the carbon measuring group, Offsetters for it’s modestly-named Step Forward Paper, made of 80% straw and 20% Forest Stewardship Council paper.

And now, Harrelson is revved for the next phase in his 14-year entrepreneurial odyssey to go completely forest-free. ..........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.nowtoronto.com/news/story.cfm?content=189516



7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Woody Harrelson pushes tree-free paper (Original Post) marmar Nov 2012 OP
There is a shrub Dyedinthewoolliberal Nov 2012 #1
I can't wait till I can grow hemp in my backyard Viva_La_Revolution Nov 2012 #2
Every time I see the phrase "agricultural waste" NickB79 Nov 2012 #3
Is agriculture at its very core sustainable? NoOneMan Nov 2012 #5
Agreed. I think the future of farming is in agro-forestry NickB79 Nov 2012 #6
I don't see it as a future NoOneMan Nov 2012 #7
I have a notebook of paper made out of elephant dung jmondine Nov 2012 #4

Dyedinthewoolliberal

(15,577 posts)
1. There is a shrub
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 11:45 AM
Nov 2012

I th ink it's a shrub, called kenaf that can be used to make paper, be harvested a couple times a year and is virtually identical to paper. Hope they check that out also........

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
2. I can't wait till I can grow hemp in my backyard
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 01:14 PM
Nov 2012

I'm gonna make paper and cloth, and use the seeds for food.


someday...

NickB79

(19,253 posts)
3. Every time I see the phrase "agricultural waste"
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 01:52 PM
Nov 2012

I grind my teeth in frustration.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AGRICULTURAL WASTE!

What you call "waste" is valuable biomass that needs to stay IN THE FIELD to build the soil, hold moisture and store carbon.

It's ridiculous that we've lost a foot of topsoil in this country already, yet still think we can keep pulling every last leaf and stem of biomass off of our fields as though that's somehow "sustainable".

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
5. Is agriculture at its very core sustainable?
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 02:55 PM
Nov 2012

IOW, cultivating land to create surplus that fuels population growth, which in turn demands more land cultivation. At some point, the system will collapse (much sooner though when we till and pour fertilizers and pesticides on the fields).

I am dumbfounded that as a species we could choose a leisurely, sustainable existence as argo-forestry farmers (more akin to gatherers), but instead we either choose to dominate nature & work the fields or offices to our deaths. Its all unsustainable and absolutely un-natural.

NickB79

(19,253 posts)
6. Agreed. I think the future of farming is in agro-forestry
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 03:15 PM
Nov 2012

For example, this: http://www.badgersett.com/

No tilling, no fertilizing, improving soil structure year after year, along with long-term carbon storage in their wood and roots.

They've already developed hybrid hazels and chestnuts capable of competing with corn and soy, acre-for-acre, that can also withstand drought and flooding that would decimate conventional fields. Plus, since they're in the same state as me (Minnesota), their plants are hardy down to -30F.

I have a few of their neohazels and chestnuts in my yard. I'll be adding more next year.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
7. I don't see it as a future
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 03:32 PM
Nov 2012

I see it as an alternative thread of reality that we cannot reach in our current projectory (unless a large global bottleneck allows people to reset the social & agricultural model). A few brilliant people are doing it (I hope to be one if I can ever afford land).

Everything about agro-forestry contradicts our very social model. It doesn't produce instant return, allowing for instant growth (4-7 years of zero yield). It doesn't require a large amount of debt to start (no machines, little processing of outputs), fueling constant production. It doesn't require a massive amount of inputs or water, and almost zero once its established. It doesn't even require a major time commitment from "farmers" unless you scale up. If every one had a half to quarter acre of a forest garden, it would basically run itself once established.

There is a reason many native American tribes would practice this form of agriculture (and civilization has rejected their way of life).

Unfortunately, while I don't see it as the future, I believe it is one of the only models we can utilize going forward to also heal the planet.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Woody Harrelson pushes tr...