Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 10:11 PM Nov 2012

Der Spiegel - Going Through The Motions In Doha

Protecting the climate is incredibly important to Germany's parliament, the Bundestag, as evidenced by all the resolutions it has adopted in the past to save the planet. Germany has climate funds and reduction targets, building and transportation programs, and even an entire strategy to wean itself off nuclear power and shift to green energy, which has been dubbed the Energiewende, or "energy revolution." But at some point there is such a thing as overkill.

Can a member of parliament be expected to be chauffeured around Berlin in a small car? Or should he even stoop to the level of taking a cab? Now that, the Bundestag recently decided, would be asking too much. But because the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by the elegant limousines normally used to chauffeur German lawmakers exceeds standards set three years ago, the Bundestag came up with a convenient solution. They simply raised the previously established limit of 120 grams of CO2 per kilometer to 140. And what about the fact that the European Commission in Brussels has been fighting for months to set the limit at 95 grams? Forget it! And the climate? Oh, that again.

Only a few years ago, lawmakers would have hardly dared raise the limits for allowable greenhouse gas emissions coming from their official cars. They would have been too worried about upsetting climate activists and triggering outraged editorials in the papers.

But things have changed, so much so that the Bundestag's decision hardly attracted any notice in the press, and neither did the government's decision to eliminate a rule requiring official trips to be climate-neutral. As mundane as these decisions seem, they symbolize a significant failure, namely that no issue of global urgency has tanked quite as quickly as the warming of the earth's climate.

EDIT

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/failed-co2-targets-going-through-the-motions-at-un-climate-conference-a-869294.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
1. "Going through the motions" is right.
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 05:57 AM
Nov 2012

> But things have changed, so much so that the Bundestag's decision hardly attracted any notice
> in the press, and neither did the government's decision to eliminate a rule requiring official trips
> to be climate-neutral. As mundane as these decisions seem, they symbolize a significant failure,
> namely that no issue of global urgency has tanked quite as quickly as the warming of the earth's
> climate.

>> This only amplifies the bizarrely ritualistic nature of the Climate Change Conference starting
>> this week in Doha, Qatar. Thousands of negotiators, environmentalists and industry lobbyists
>> are meeting in the Arab emirate to set the course for an international treaty to limit greenhouse
>> gas emissions.
>> But the world has already turned its back on the issue.

>> Instead of declining, emissions continue to rise year after year.

>> According to the 2011 World Energy Outlook published by the International Energy Agency (IEA),
>> global fossil fuel subsidies jumped 30 percent to $523 billion (€403 billion) last year. Although
>> countries are spending more and more on renewable energy, subsidies for coal, oil and gas are
>> still six times as high. About 1,200 new coal-fired power plants are planned worldwide, and
>> even Germany generated more electricity from coal in the first nine months of this year than it has
>> in a long time.

Go Tool Monkeys!



CRH

(1,553 posts)
2. Half a trillion dollars in fossil fuel private enterprise subsidies, ...
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 09:01 AM
Nov 2012

rather than let privatized profits diminish and using that allocation for alternatives R&D, mass transit, and conservation strategies.

The global ruling class is not ignorant of the science, or the timeline, they just have no intention of serving in the best interest of peoples' future. I guess with a crashed global civilization as a likely result, they won't have to worry much how history, records their neglect.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
4. It seems to me that GlobCiv would dissolve either way.
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 01:22 PM
Nov 2012

If we don't put the brakes on FF use we use it till it's all gone and suffer +6C or more.

If we try to put the brakes on FF use, we threaten to stop economic growth. That would result in the 99% rising up in a gallows-and-guillotines fury, and replacing the decapitated owners with other men who will take the brakes back off.

If we succeed in putting the brakes on but not stopping FF use altogether, we just delay our date with destiny.

If we succeed in turning the FF tap off completely, civilization crashes instantly.

Have I missed something?

CRH

(1,553 posts)
5. No you haven't missed anything, ...
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 06:11 PM
Nov 2012

the only thing I highlight is we won't be around to suffer 6*C unless it happens real fast. The goose is cooked at four, by six it is ashes. Humanity is history.

If we succeed in turning the FF tap off completely, civilization crashes instantly.

Which give us more time but doesn't change the outcome, is just a slow kill; as runaway GW will not be contained with no action. Collapse does not produce action. The runaway global warming is happening now, and anything that doesn't interrupt the heat cycle, only delays the enevitable.

It is time for me to stop posting, and enjoy gardening. CIO hrh

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
3. at this point, I assume they're just doing it for the catering spread
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 12:34 PM
Nov 2012

it's becoming an increasingly open secret that nobody believes anything actionable will come of these junkets

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Der Spiegel - Going Throu...