Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 07:57 AM Feb 2013

Damage From US Navy Ship to Pristine Reef Far Worse Than Estimated

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/02/03


The U.S. Navy-contracted Malaysian tug Vos Apollo removes petroleum-based products and human wastewater from the mine countermeasure ship USS Guardian (MCM 5), which ran aground on the Tubbataha Reef in the Sulu Sea on Jan. 17. (U.S. Navy photo/Released)

With attempts to salvage a US Navy minesweeper stranded in a pristine coral reef in the Philippines not yet underway, reports indicate that the damage the grounding caused to the marine sanctuary is far worse than initially estimated.

The USS Guardian ran aground in the Tubbataha Reef Marine Park, a UNESCO World Heritage site, on Jan. 17 after ignoring warnings from park rangers, and has remained there battling waves and sparking environmental concerns since.

On Saturday, marine park manager Angelique Songco said that at least 4,000 square meters of coral reefs were damaged, four times worse than initial estimates.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
1. Not to worry, in 100,000 years or so it will recover ...
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 08:40 AM
Feb 2013

... assuming climate change doesn't worsen its prospects.

This is criminal negligence.

NickB79

(19,257 posts)
4. Assuming corals aren't extinct by then
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:59 PM
Feb 2013

Well, maybe some will hang on in the Arctic Circle, until the more equatorial oceans cool back down.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
2. The minesweeper is about 224 feet long...which is a slightly more than 65 meters long
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 10:23 AM
Feb 2013

The square of 65 is a couple hundred more than 4000.

So, the minesweeper has damaged an area somewhat less than the square of it's length.

That's obviously not a great thing in a world heritage site, but at the same time, it is limited.

The original estimate must have been pretty close to the dimensions of the hull.


AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
3. It has moved somewhat forward since the intial grounding.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:49 PM
Feb 2013

Presumably why they didn't just yank it backwards after lightening it. Also, it probably rocks considerably from side to side, spreading the damage.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
6. The picture in the OP show's it up on the reef along the entire length of the ship
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 04:30 PM
Feb 2013

I suspect much of the damage is caused by a combination of bumping, dragging over and force of resting completely on top of the reef at low tide.

The good news seems to be little or no fuel or hydraulic fluid leaking...yet.

I'd expect the reef to recover relatively quickly if the damage doesn't create a change in water current that interferes with recolonization.

NickB79

(19,257 posts)
5. I'm more concerned about the leaking oil and human shit
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 04:00 PM
Feb 2013
The U.S. Navy-contracted Malaysian tug Vos Apollo removes petroleum-based products and human wastewater from the mine countermeasure ship USS Guardian


Yuck!

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
7. Oil would be a bad thing, and even a small amount would spread...
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 04:38 PM
Feb 2013

the current limited area impacted seems to suggest that hasn't happened...yet.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Damage From US Navy Ship ...