Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 09:05 AM Mar 2013

Don't Worry - NYT's Website Redesign Will Make Looking For Non-Existent Environment News Quik-n-Easy

EDIT

(Some readers also noted unhappily that the news of the Green blog’s demise was announced at 5 p.m. on Friday, a convenient time for an inconvenient truth. Mr. Baquet agreed that, in retrospect, “we could have handled that better.”)

As for the complaint that readers with a particular interest in the environment can no longer go to a single online destination, “I acknowledge that criticism,” he said. He said, though, that he hopes that a continuing Web site redesign may make it easier for readers to locate the topics that they are particularly interested in.

Ms. Kenney described the blog’s strengths. “When there was an overriding issue or event, the blog was a locus and a magnet, attracting tens of thousands of readers” to a particular post, she said, “with the Deepwater Horizon spill as a great example.”

She added, “I’d be the first to admit that the blog was uneven because of a shortage of resources.” It needed a dedicated editor, she said; as deputy environment editor, she was able to give it only a few hours a day, given her other duties.

EDIT

http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/05/for-times-environmental-reporting-intentions-may-be-good-but-the-signs-are-not/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Don't Worry - NYT's Website Redesign Will Make Looking For Non-Existent Environment News Quik-n-Easy (Original Post) hatrack Mar 2013 OP
The Guardian's environmental coverage kicks ass wtmusic Mar 2013 #1
“When there was an overriding issue or event..." translated: cprise Mar 2013 #2

cprise

(8,445 posts)
2. “When there was an overriding issue or event..." translated:
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 07:36 PM
Mar 2013

We don't particularly care for environment-related news... unless its SENSATIONAL and can bring us a ton a traffic with little reporting effort.

That company disappeared into some weird Washington-freemarket consensus haze and by now I'm sure they won't be coming back to reality-- the editors are thinking too much about their stock options.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Don't Worry - NYT's Websi...