Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumAerial survey finds contamination "significantly reduced" at Fukushima
"The latest aerial survey of the Fukushima region reveals a pattern of contamination significantly reduced in the space of a year by natural processes of radioactive decay and dispersal.
The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) released the latest map on 1 March, based on data collected by a survey during October and December last year. Compared to the version from October and November 2011 it shows widespread recolouring, with each colour change indicating a reduction by half in surveyed radiation dose.
Most obvious is a marked reduction in the size of the red portion, which represents high radiation dose rates of over 19.0 microSieverts per hour (uSv/h) - some 166 milliSieverts per year (mSv/y). Anything above 50 mSv/y is characterised as 'difficult to return to' by Japanese authorities. "
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_Radiation_declines_at_Fukushima_0603131.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1735 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Aerial survey finds contamination "significantly reduced" at Fukushima (Original Post)
wtmusic
Mar 2013
OP
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)1. Not much of a surprise
There are some physical constants involved.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)2. BioAccumulation - Cesium 5,100 times safe level found in fish (Feb 2013)
Record cesium level found in Fukushima fish
March 01, 2013
THE ASAHI SHIMBUN
A record concentration of radioactive cesium--5,100 times the government's food safety standard--was detected in a fish caught near the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, the plants operator said Feb. 28.
Tokyo Electric Power Co. said the reading of 510,000 becquerels per kilogram in the greenling is the highest ever recorded in the utilitys seafood sampling surveys following the March 2011 disaster at the nuclear plant.
The finding was announced Feb. 28 at a meeting of leaders of the Fukushima Prefectural Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations.
The greenling was found caught Feb. 17 in a gill net at the mouth of the plant's port. The net was installed to prevent fish from drifting outside.
March 01, 2013
THE ASAHI SHIMBUN
A record concentration of radioactive cesium--5,100 times the government's food safety standard--was detected in a fish caught near the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, the plants operator said Feb. 28.
Tokyo Electric Power Co. said the reading of 510,000 becquerels per kilogram in the greenling is the highest ever recorded in the utilitys seafood sampling surveys following the March 2011 disaster at the nuclear plant.
The finding was announced Feb. 28 at a meeting of leaders of the Fukushima Prefectural Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations.
The greenling was found caught Feb. 17 in a gill net at the mouth of the plant's port. The net was installed to prevent fish from drifting outside.
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)4. So? BioAccumulation is not the same thing as bio-multiplication.
(of course there is no such thing).
In general, exposure for the population is going down - from already very low levels. Bioaccumulation in bottom-feeding fish that nobody was going to eat anyway is scientifically interesting, but nothing has been found to date that would unexpectedly expose a member of the public to dangerous levels of contamination.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)3. levels almost half the "difficult to return" to area extend 20+km away
even nearly two years later.
i wouldn't call this good news.
i'd call it slightly less bad than awful news.